Am Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2005 05:46 schrieb Grimer:
Conceivably, in the limit, one could hydrinate all the
water in the apparatus. If it proved possible to trigger
the release of the hydrinated energy in a chain reaction
one would effectively have a high explosive water bomb.
Cheers,
Frank
Original Message -
Mounting two magnets (separated) inside a non-magnetic coil spring
(compression) so that
the 1/R^4 attractive force can aid in compressing it when it's dropped from
a height
sufficient to cause it to compress slightly (thermal collision force aided
by the Casimir force)
At 10:17 am 20/07/2005 +0200, you wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2005 05:46 schrieb Grimer:
Conceivably, in the limit, one could hydrinate all the
water in the apparatus. If it proved possible to trigger
the release of the hydrinated energy in a chain reaction
one would effectively have a high
This guy bought a kit:
http://www.seti.net/SETINet/Engineering/Hardware/Test%20Equipment/Test%20Equipment.htm#WeakSignalSource
or
http://tinyurl.com/csjdk
for testing those homemade SETI receivers. It doesn't state the power, however.
Thanks Terry,
for testing those homemade SETI receivers. It doesn't state the
power, however.
By blowing up the graph it looks like the power is 14.5 dBm and
using the conversion graph on
http://www.ictp.trieste.it/~radionet/2001_school/docs/other/dbm_chart.pdf
this works out to about
For those wanting to start off their Wednesday with a ROTFL
knee-slapper, or at least a chuckle, check out Gary McKinnon's
tale on:
http://freeenergynews.com/
It is the lead story for today's date. You can't miss it if you
are thinking hmmm,maybefirst runner-up in the Alfred E.
From: Jones Beene
Of course that low output
could possibly be used for driving the gate for a power GaAs
FET, or could it?
Yeah, but why reinvent the wheel? Here's an 8 W module with 50 dB of gain
which uses about the same Vdc:
http://www.empowerrf.com/docs/3028.doc
A bit more linear
From: Jones Beene
For those wanting to start off their Wednesday with a ROTFL
knee-slapper, or at least a chuckle, check out Gary McKinnon's
tale
I know most on this list dismiss this sort of thing; but, you really should
read his entire expose:
An article about my bete noire:
http://slate.com/id/2122961/
The article should have made some other important points. It said:
The ethanol lobby claims there's a 30 percent net gain in BTUs from
ethanol made from corn.
Even if that is true, it is still pathetic. You can achieve far better
Some issues and reactions similar to those of cold fusion:
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,68216,00.html
I cannot judge, but some of this research seems impressive. It is
statistical in nature and it has not been replicated elsewhere. That puts
it in the same category as the top
From: Terry Blanton
Gating becomes the issue (51 Hz switching)
It says instantaneous so, I suppose you could gate the supply voltage.
(Depends on what the meaning of 'instantaneous' is is is.
Specs say suitable for all forms of modulation and they rent them.
Ron
--On Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:02 AM -0400 Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: Terry Blanton
>
>> Gating becomes the issue (51 Hz switching)
>
> It says instantaneous so, I suppose you could gate the
>
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Blanton"
you really should read his entire
expose: http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,1523143,00.html
Ya gotta like this guy...
I mean, geeze(to borrow from Sara Lee)
... nobody doesn't like Alfred E
And 70 years in the
Gating becomes the issue (51 Hz switching)
It says instantaneous so, I suppose you could gate the supply
voltage.
Yes that is what I was thinking.
Depends on what the meaning of 'instantaneous' is is is and if
it si FTL it would be:
...is is is 'instantaneous'
BTW Frederick Sparber
From: Jed Rothwell
I cannot judge, but some of this research seems impressive.
I have been following Dean Radin for almost a decade now. Actually, he used to
work in the Princeton Psychology department and had a falling out over his
research. Where he now works, the Institute of Noetic
From: Jones Beene
Nah... wonder how close Naudin's lab is to one of those big
submarine LF transmission fields? Actually there is on off a
hiking trail near me, about 5 acres of wires, looking fairly
haphazardly arranged, and ours works at 45 Hz but do you think in
France it could be
Terry Blanton wrote:
From: Jones Beene
For those wanting to start off their Wednesday with a ROTFL
knee-slapper, or at least a chuckle, check out Gary McKinnon's
tale
I know most on this list dismiss this sort of thing; but, you really should
read his entire expose:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
I did. I really feel sorry for the guy. He made some dumb moves, but 70
years in the slammer??
That's unspeakable. The only people who should be punished are the ones who
left the computers on line with no password. This guy performed a public
service.
And
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 12:28, Jones Beene wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton
you really should read his entire expose:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,1523143,00.html
Ya gotta like this guy...
I mean, geeze (to borrow from Sara Lee) ... nobody
Lo and behold:
http://www.edf.fr/download.php4?coe_i_id=54806
It turns out that the French system is variable
between 49-51 Hz and that the higher number would be expected when the plant is
running at thremal maximum... in l'ete, shall we say...
That is logical - your turbines are
There are people that actually refuse to believe that Remote Viewing is real too, despite all the evidence. Actually this article is based on the work of much older studies. Also, Hal Puthoff experimented on this topic with Ingo Swann in the early days of RV in attempts to manipulate machines
From: Jones Beene
but is there any reason why, if the lab is in or near a power station,
and the MAHG tube were somehow picking up energy from a transformer - that
you would have that one Hertz shift?
The stability standard is +/- 1% but even a 0.5 Hz shift is detrimental to a
heavy
From: Terry Blanton
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
. . . you can be 99% sure, has nothing to
do with any supposed secret space station.
Assuming he is lying, what would be his motive?
Just a thought here...
Admittedly this might be considered a far fetch rationalization, but I
Jones Beene wrote:
Lo and behold:
http://www.edf.fr/download.php4?coe_i_id=54806
It turns out that the French system is variable between 49-51 Hz and
that the higher number would be expected when the plant is running at
thremal maximum... in l'été, shall we say...
Je ne comprend
From: Christopher Arnold
There are people that actually refuse to believe that
Remote Viewing is real too, despite all the evidence.
Actually this article is based on the work of much older
studies. Also, Hal Puthoff experimented on this topic
with Ingo Swann in the early days of RV in
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.edf.fr/download.php4?coe_i_id=54806
It turns out that the French system is variable between 49-51
Hz and that the higher number would be expected when the plant
is running at thremal maximum... in l'été, shall we say...
Je ne comprend
From: Jones Beene
It turns out that the French system is variable between 49-51 Hz and that the
higher number would be expected when the plant is running at thremal
maximum... in l'ete, shall we say...
I don't think this is right. This the maximum variation for ENGAGING a
generator to
Experiment -- and experiment alone -- is only standard of truth. If there
have not been many experiments in remote viewing, then no one knows whether
it is real or not.
- Jed
I have to respectfully disagree with that statement. Suppose you observe
some scientific phenomena which only occurs
We could be making a mountain out of a molehill, as this small
point probably does not explain anything which is relevant to
MAHG, anyway, but...
This the maximum variation for ENGAGING a generator to the
network. Once engaged there will be a forced synchronization.
Outside this range the
From: Jones Beene
See the graphic on page 8 of the previous cite - looks like
anything between 48 and 52 in normal
I haven't figured out what that silly graph is saying. :-) I think it's
telling how the voltage will vary with frequency. I think the graph at the top
of p. 12 tells
From: Jones Beene
See the graphic on page 8 of the previous cite - looks like
anything between 48 and 52 in normal
I haven't figured out what that silly graph is saying. :-) I think it's
telling how the voltage will vary with frequency. I think the graph at the top
of p. 12 tells
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a thought here...
Several good thoughts!
Have you read Dan Brown's Digital Fortress?
Speaking of off-time-ly humor, our Prez - Dubya, along with Tony
Blair and Jacques Chirac were relaxing in a Parisian sauna at a
chic salon, noticing that all of the clocks seemed to be off the
correct time. Suddenly, there was a beeping sound.
Dubya presses his forearm the beeping stopped.
From: Christopher Arnold
Also, Hal Puthoff experimented on this topic with Ingo Swann in the early days
of RV in attempts to manipulate machines from a distance.
Actually, Pat Price put effeminate Swann to shame. You should do a little
research on Price, his performance, and his fate. eg
From: Terry Blanton
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a thought here...
Several good thoughts!
Have you read Dan Brown's Digital Fortress?
no.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
A few additional thoughts regarding the debate over RV:
Jed sez:
If remote viewing actually exists, it must
have a naturalistic explanation. I suppose
it must be a subtle form of communication,
or coordinated thinking similar to the coral
coordination. A person in one part of the
world
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you read Dan Brown's Digital Fortress?
no.
Oh, okay, don't bother.
BUT, I bet you would enjoy Angels and Demons by him. . . unless you're
Catholic.
Remote viewing is real, it does work and I am living proof. I can only comment on what I have personally done, and if you don't believe it worked - look at my patent.
New technologies do not grow on trees and they seldom get invented by following the old established literature - besides, I have
Jed- I don't think that C F is inviolation of the traditional laws
of physics. I think its an another method where as the laws
can act to produce fusion. GES
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah yes, ACC's Childhood's End may yet be our ultimate destiny!
The truly interesting idea is that that destiny may be what makes us different
and a possible object of scrutiny of Others. IMNSHO, g it is more likely
that all intelligent civilizations have a hive mind.
Jones made an interesting comment on a past post regarding black holes
which gave me pause and thought. Granted that black holes remain theoretical. We
must remember that what is observed in distant space occurred some millions of
years ago and is not necessarily indicative of the present.
From: Jones Beene
Oui, exactment ...but that does not mean that when the temperatue
on a July day is pushing 38 that the single operator (EDF) will
not tell every plant to max out at 51 Hz, no?
Well, if you had only one generator that might help a bit. It's the torque
that generates the
Jed Rothwell wrote:
I wrote:
Of course remote viewing or the Jahn effects seem impossible based on
what we now know of biology and physics, but we know practically
NOTHING about biology. I can list dozens of ordinary, everyday
biological phenomena that seem utterly incredible, and which
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/20 Wed PM 09:11:05 EDT
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: US military does ZPE
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you read Dan Brown's Digital Fortress?
no.
Oh, okay, don't bother.
BUT, I bet you would enjoy Angels and
From: Terry Blanton
...
As far as verbal communications goes, my wife's BAUD rate
far exceeds mine. ;-)
As does mine.
You have my simpathies.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Extremely unlikely indeed, if we arbitrarily focus our hypothesis on the
premise that RV is caused by
electromagnetic radiation emanating from the brain.
As far as I know, nothing else emanates from the brain. What else could there
be, neutrinos? Entangled
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully, trying to bring this personal manifesto to a reasonably
short conclusion, might I suggest that the problem may lie more in our
current perceptions of what makes up the core of our INDIVIDUALITY -
our sense of SELF. First of all, I would wager that the
Jones Beene wrote:
We could be making a mountain out of a molehill, as this small point
probably does not explain anything which is relevant to MAHG, anyway,
but...
This the maximum variation for ENGAGING a generator to the network.
Once engaged there will be a forced synchronization.
Jed,
Before I started RV, I had several very vivid astral projections and if I may suggest a possibility. The body is an instrument housing a multi-layered entity not of this dimension but connected to the body - call it the soul or pure mind. Throughout "all" recorded history,shamenhave been
49 matches
Mail list logo
