http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=508297
Good job Jedthey didn't print mine. I can see that yours was a better
choice. But even still, I suspect that my, and perhaps other letters made
them take notice. I think we should all keep this in mind. Cold fusion is
at a transition point
At 12:24 pm 22/07/2005 -0700, wrote:
>It is a very compelling theory Frank, but I don't
>think it works out.
>
Spurred on by Merlyn, the "Magickal Engineer and
Technical Metaphysicist", who by his own appelation
has obviously the right approach to the way out
thinking required for a conceptual
At 04:04 pm 22/07/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>BlankRichard wrote..
> Frank, a simple proof of principle of your thoughts
>> on catalysis can be observed with the mixing of a
>> two part epoxy. Try mixing a cubic inch square mold
>> full versus a thin film layer on a surface.
>> The reaction and har
Update to the Cold Fusion Times (volume 12, number 2)
is up at http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html [click on pic for larger
pic].
Contents: The MIT 2005 Cold Fusion Colloquium with Tribute to Dr. Eugene
Mallove
FUSION ADVANCES
Cavitation/Ferroelectic Fusion
D-D Fusion in Ferroelectrics
How good could the article be with such inaccuracy about cold fusion?
The Real Deal, The verdict so far: Cold fusion is achievable by hard effort.
Proof: Update to the Cold Fusion Times (volume 12, number 2)
is up at http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html [click on pic for
larger pic].
At 12:24 pm 22/07/2005 -0700, Merlyn wrote:> It is a very
compelling theory Frank, You say the nicest things, Merlyn.
8-)> but I don't think it works out.But here comes the
"but" ;^)>--- Grimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>> I
find myself in this situation with regard to the >> effect o
Madrian Mistaken About Cold Fusion
DebateBy JED ROTHWELL
To the
editors:
In a letter to the editor ("Hoxby Misrepresented In
Article on Academic Debate, July 15), Brigitte C. Madrian wrote, This is
not like the cold fusion debate of the 1980s in which a highly acclaimed
finding, publi
> From: "Jones Beene"
> ... except I swore off drinking as my new year's resolution.
SACRILEGE! :-)
No, your experiment looks fine. Do you know someone that can perform it? I
really don't understand why Earth Tech isn't interested unless they have lost
their Prince. ;-)
SACRE BLEU! I wi
> From: What's New <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 7/22/2005 1:35:23 PM
Subject: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday July 22, 2005
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 22 Jul 05 Washington, DC
NOTICE: Maryland has the WN search engine running. There's not
enough spa
At 12:24 pm 22/07/2005 -0700, Merlyn wrote:
> It is a very compelling theory Frank,
You say the nicest things, Merlyn. 8-)
> but I don't think it works out.
But here comes the "but" ;^)
>--- Grimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I find myself in this situation with regard to the
>> eff
Terry,
I'm having a real problem understanding this. The 21 cm
hydrogen line is caused by the hyperfine structure of the 1s
level of the hydrogen atom. This splitting of the 1s level is
due to the interaction of the nuclear spin and the electron
spin. When these spins are parallel the hydr
Richard wrote..
Frank, a simple proof of principle of your thoughts > on
catalysis can be observed with the mixing of a > two part epoxy. Try
mixing a cubic inch square mold > full versus a thin film layer on a
surface. > The reaction and hardening time differs whereas the >
cubic inch mold
> From: "Jones Beene"
> Hydrogen seems to be uniquely placed in having these overlapping
> traits:
>
> 1) a resonance point that is easy to achieve spatially, since the
> 21 cm wavelength is a size which fits in nicely with many existing
> lab items and tubes.
I'm having a real problem under
> From: Jed
...
> Yesterday I mentioned that Mizuno paid for his own equipment
> for 5 or 10 years. You may have noticed the numbers do not
> add up, since he has been doing CF for 16 years. As I
> reported here some time ago, starting ~5 years ago unnamed
> corporations have given him grants
Some governments are disclosing some information:
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,16000752-13762,00.html
On 22 Jul 2005 at 17:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Stephan Vincent Johnson.- If the government does have evidence
>of UFO'S . When would they tell us.-the p
Christopher Arnold wrote:
. . . used the rest of my life savings building the prototypes and paying
for testing that nobody would believe.
Plenty of people will believe testing if it is properly performed and
properly presented. You have an audience here that is inclined to believe it.
I ha
It is a very compelling theory Frank, but I don't
think it works out.
--- Grimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find myself in this situation with regard to the
> effect of drop in Beta-atmospheric (B-a) pressure
> on the strength of the attraction and repulsion of
> positive and negative char
Terry,
IOW "very little energy" per unit volume can amount to
substantial energy when it is withdrawn rapidly and
instantaneously replinished.
Well, yeah, understood; but, if you're right, we should be able
to find a 170 mm process. I just getting ahead of myself here.
Yes - I see - that
I'm glad to see someone is making some vortex money:
http://www.implosionresearch.com/
I gotta get me one of those "Personal Harmonizers".
Stephan Vincent Johnson.- If the government does have evidence
of UFO'S . When would they tell us.-the people.
It seems we should be mature enough to handle it at this time.
If not now when?-Unless there are no Ufo's-GES
Some ongoing discussion group threads:
http://italy.indymedia.org/news/2005/07/839109_comment.php
http://www.forumcommunity.net/?t=1523365
This one is about W glow discharge.
You can see a rough translation of these using the Google tool here:
http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en
The s
Terry Blanton wrote:
>
> > From: "Frederick Sparber"
>
> > I wouldn't try to explain it anymore than trying to explain the
connection
> > between the reported 550 ft height
> > of the Washington Monument and 550 ft-lbs per second in the horsepower.
:-)
>
> Okay, I forgot that we don't believe thi
At 06:49 am 22/07/2005 -0500, Richard wrote:
> Grimer wrote..
>> A mention is also made of catalysis. It
>>seems to me that the phenomena of cold
>> fusion could well be a case of macro-
>> catalysis.
>
> Have been interested in Putterman's work for some
> 10 years in regards to cavitation stu
> From: "Stephen A. Lawrence"
> Unfortunately, it's been shown that they don't work,
NEST *does* have some airborne detectors that work, sometimes.
Here's a definitive article on detection of terrorist nukes:
http://www.devabhaktuni.us/research/disarm.pdf
> From: "Jones Beene"
> IOW "very little energy" per unit volume can amount to
> substantial energy when it is withdrawn rapidly and
> instantaneously replinished.
Well, yeah, understood; but, if you're right, we should be able to find a 170
mm process. I just getting ahead of myself here.
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTneutronevoa.pdf
File now includes all text
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoThydrogenev.pdf
New. (There is a grammatical mistake in the abstract. I would like to point
out that it is not my fault. My version was perfectly good but someone at
JJAP m
> From: "Frederick Sparber"
> I wouldn't try to explain it anymore than trying to explain the connection
> between the reported 550 ft height
> of the Washington Monument and 550 ft-lbs per second in the horsepower. :-)
Okay, I forgot that we don't believe this is atomic hydrogen. Geeze, I can
Jones Beene wrote:
> Fred
> > Two protons in a H2 molecule separated by a distance R of 1.0E-10 meters experience a coulomb
>> repulsive force F = kq^2/R^2 = 2.304E-8 nt and have a potential energy E = kq^2/R joules.
>> A hard ball thermal collision can force >>the two protons closer toge
Terry,
Yeah, but, there's very little energy at those frequencies:
Well, let's qualify that. There is little apparent energy form CMB
in local 3-space (per unit volume), but enormous amounts of it in
4-space (net). If this radiation is a relic of the "big bang" as
some suggest, then there i
Terry Blanton wrote:
>
> > From: "Frederick Sparber"
>
> > Collision frequency = 1.423E9 per second. :-)
>
> (Will you plase delete your "reply to" line.)
>
I would if I knew where to find it on this new earthlink mess. :-)
>
> > From: "Frederick Sparber"
>
> > Collision frequency = 1.42
> From: "Jones Beene"
> As to why there would be an excess of radiation at this frequency
> in the first place, that would be the "leap of faith" that the CMB
> is the predominant ZPE frequency, due to its ubiquity throughout
> the universe. It would show up here because the collisional
> freq
Mike Carrell wrote:
From: "thomas malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: some technical questions
He also contends that a satellite, equipped with a detector for Gamma
radiation would be able to detect a nuclear bomb from orbit.
Before or after it explodes? No way *before* it explode
A simple experiment to test the notion that ZPE energy at the CMB
frequency of 1420 MHz can be "cohered" simply by a resonant
collisional frequency:
Take a well-sealed steel pipe of adequate volume and fill with
hydrogen at a predetermined pressure. There will be a resistive
nichrome wire hea
Terry,
There are different views on these mechanics - you ask:
I can't find my copy of "QM for Dummies"; so, could you please
explain why the
energy of hyperfine spin exchange and the collision frequency
could somehow
produce ou?
In one view (which Fred does not 'buy' ... yet), there would
That subject doesn't mean what it usually means.
Yesterday I mentioned that Mizuno paid for his own equipment for 5 or 10
years. You may have noticed the numbers do not add up, since he has been
doing CF for 16 years. As I reported here some time ago, starting ~5 years
ago unnamed corporations
> From: "Frederick Sparber"
> Collision frequency = 1.423E9 per second. :-)
(Will you plase delete your "reply to" line.)
> From: "Frederick Sparber"
> Collision frequency = 1.423E9 per second. :-)
I can't find my copy of "QM for Dummies"; so, could you please explain why the
energy of
Frederick
There is one major problem with this. That is the assumtion that
the temperature gain derives from the heat of the gas itself
within the tube, being transfered to the tube wall, where it is
removed by the water flow. That might be the case, or not.
Alternatively, If the 100 watt t
Fred,
> Two protons in a H2 molecule separated by a distance R of 1.0E-10
meters experience a coulomb repulsive force F = kq^2/R^2 = 2.304E-8
nt and have a potential energy E = kq^2/R joules. A hard ball
thermal collision can force the two protons closer togetherand if assisted by
the
From: "thomas malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: some technical questions
> My nephew was home last weekend. We got into it.
>
> I felt that it was my avuncular duty to warn him that he is living at
> ground zero of one of Al Queda's prime targets, NYC's Times Square.
> That just make him host
Grimer wrote..
>A mention is also made of catalysis. It seems to me that the
phenomena of cold fusion could well be a case of macro-catalysis.
Have been interested in Putterman's work for some 10 years in regards to
cavitation studies.
Frank, a simple proof of principle of your thoughts on cat
GSU, Pressure-Volume -Temperature Calculator:
MAHG, Initial 300 K @ 76 mm Hg (10.13 kPa) 0.5 liter volume
Final @ 100 watts 1140 mm Hg (151.95 kPa) 4500 K Effective Temp of H2 Molecules.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/idegasc.html#c1
The GSU site can be difficult.
Mean Free Path & Collision Frequency:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/frecol.html#c1
Try 76 torr (mm Hg) @ 300 K and ~ 1360 Torr @ 5400 K
2 AMU & 1.32E-10 meter H2 molecule diameter.
Collision frequency = 1.423E9 per second
Jones.
Mean Free Path & Collision Frequency:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/inecon.html
Moment of Inertia of a Sphere:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/isph.html
Moment of Inertia of a Hoop:
http://hyper
My nephew was home last weekend. We got into it.
I felt that it was my avuncular duty to warn him that he is living at
ground zero of one of Al Queda's prime targets, NYC's Times Square.
That just make him hostile.
Then I mentioned the ITER. He works for an electricity generating
company, an
Someone posted the URL http://cycclone.com/welcome/page1.php . I
sent them an email asking if they had a working prototype and if they
were giving demonstrations. That was several days ago and I haven't
received a reply. It would be great if it worked, but IMHO, there is
no reason for it to w
I have been re-reading Putterman's remarkably frank
and intelligible New Scientist article.
http://www.physics.ucla.edu/Sonoluminescence/sono.pdf
and found two very significant points which have
a direct bearing on the effect of reduced
Beta-atmosphere pressures.
The first bit which drew
46 matches
Mail list logo
