[Vo]: Re: E-Field Mass Cancellation

2006-11-15 Thread Frederick Sparber
Doyle Buehler's Capacitor Experiments suggest that a high concentration of Negative (electron) Charge effects the most Inertial Mass Cancellation (IMC). Note the concentration (negative charge density) IMC results fromthe 100Kilovolts on the small ball, or the smaller two-plate capacitor (about

Re: [Vo]: 2nd law of thermodynamics is incorrect

2006-11-15 Thread John Winterflood
Robin van Spaandonk wrote: A diode is not of course a very good switch and has a gently changing V/I slope (ie impedance) near zero bias. Which is precisely why you put the transformer in between. That shifts the voltage up the curve of the diode away from the zero bias point. Bear in mind

RE: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic effect on water

2006-11-15 Thread R Stiffler
Can we assume that the temperature of the magnetized sample is always less than ambient? That is correct and over a number of tests varied in the range of (-.5 to -1.6) C' below ambient. I did of course assure that this was just not a location anomaly. The last series was conducted in a fume hood

RE: [Vo]: 2nd law of thermodynamics is incorrect

2006-11-15 Thread Paul
2nd attempt to email: --- John Winterflood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: R Stiffler wrote: I guess his mail is getting messed up, the comments you make reference to were by Paul Lowrance and not myself. My mistake - sorry about that. Your formatting (without caretted indenting)

Re: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic effect on water

2006-11-15 Thread Terry Blanton
On 11/14/06, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As for the white precipitate, which could be calcium leached from the beaker - this could be due to the extra wetting of a lower surface tension in the magnetized water. Magnetic fields lower the surface tensions of H2O by up to 8% according to

[Vo]: What E.T. sees first

2006-11-15 Thread Jones Beene
Extra-crispy or extra-greasy ? http://michaelcastellon.blogspot.com/2006/11/kfcs-logo-first-to-be-seen-from-space.html

Re: [Vo]: 2nd law of thermodynamics is incorrect

2006-11-15 Thread Paul
--- John Winterflood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: R Stiffler wrote: I guess his mail is getting messed up, the comments you make reference to were by Paul Lowrance and not myself. My mistake - sorry about that. Your formatting (without caretted indenting) together with my sloppy editing

RE: [Vo]: Re: Magnetic effect on water

2006-11-15 Thread R Stiffler
Reading the link for sure has convinced me I have Fictional Water, I guess that explains why it leaves the beaker at a rate of 20mL a day when not covered :-) I thought Jones had the key and samples are now stabilizing, this may answer the 'White' particles, but I see no reason, even after

[Vo]: Hydrino Summation

2006-11-15 Thread Jones Beene
For those LENR advocates on this forum who do not closely follow the hydrino forum: a recent message from Drew Meulenberg sums up nicely the bottom line situation in the big picture of LENR, the hydrino and the past 17 years of needless posturing and animosity involving the two different

Re: [Vo]: 2nd law of thermodynamics is incorrect

2006-11-15 Thread John Winterflood
Paul wrote: I really don't see it that way. The carbon resistor is made of atoms containing charged particles. The noise is relative to the temperature of the charged particles. Neither do I. I was trying to illustrate that assigning the noise source to the radiation resistance itself or some

RE: [Vo]: Magnetic effect on water

2006-11-15 Thread Michael Foster
Somewhere on Bill's endlessly large website is an experiment showing that exposure to a magnetic field increases the viscosity of water. This is such an easy thing to test that I tried it. It really works. At first I thought that this is mysterious and inexplicable. Then it occurred to me that