Only if V or I is the Root of the Mean Square of the instantaneous value (RMS
value), which is not usually what a multimeter displays in the DC setting BTW
(it displays the average value).
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 2
If the resistance is a constant, then would either (V^2)/(R) or (I^2)(R)
equal average power?
Harry
Michel Jullian wrote:
> As discussed here before, if any or both of the current and voltage is
> constant then power can indeed be measured as simply as you said, otherwise it
> can't. It is a com
On 1/21/07, Philip Winestone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Canadian "smarts" at work, eh Philip?
All these Canadian smarts have no idea that the "eh" started off (or "aff")
in Glasgow, my city of origin. It's actually more like "aih".
Oh, CANADA! Spelled: C-eh-N-eh-D-eh.
But, I *do* love hock
In reply to Paul's message of Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:05:43 -0800 (PST):
Hi Paul,
[snip]
>If you place a load on
>the both air coils you can collect
>such energy. That's why pure inductors dissipate zero
>energy; i.e., energy goes in the
>inductor in the form of a magnetic field, but during
>the oth
Perfect Richard. But I still have to see Dime Box to believe it really
exists... and that it has a tavern...
P.
At 06:38 PM 1/21/2007 -0600, you wrote:
Philip wrote..
Excellent!!! How true!!! The reason is that the intent in all cases is to
indoctrinate along certain predictable lines thus
BlankPhilip wrote..
Excellent!!! How true!!! The reason is that the intent in all cases is to
indoctrinate along certain predictable lines thus creating a nice docile
herd. It's not to create clear, creative thinking - usually through
doubting accepted dogma then applying "lateral thinking" and
As discussed here before, if any or both of the current and voltage is constant
then power can indeed be measured as simply as you said, otherwise it can't. It
is a common mistake (or fraud) in overunity claims to pretend that average I
times average V is equal to average I*V (power) when the si
Excellent!!! How true!!! The reason is that the intent in all cases is to
indoctrinate along certain predictable lines thus creating a nice docile
herd. It's not to create clear, creative thinking - usually through
doubting accepted dogma then applying "lateral thinking" and ultimately
applyin
Canadian "smarts" at work, eh Philip?
All these Canadian smarts have no idea that the "eh" started off (or "aff")
in Glasgow, my city of origin. It's actually more like "aih".
The problem with the company's approach, from some of my tentative dealings
with them, is that like a lot of such co
Michel Jullian wrote:
> So I understood, but by DC do you mean constant
value, or just not AC (not zero average) ?
Constant voltage and current, constant value as you
put it, with no AC.
Paul
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, January
So I understood, but by DC do you mean constant value, or just not AC (not zero
average) ?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Bruce Depalma & "Free Energy
> Michel Jullian wrote:
> > - Origina
Michel Jullian wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 12:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Bruce Depalma & "Free Energy
The funny think is that the N-Machine is very
very
easy to test
>> Shhh, don't tell that to Dr
- Original Message -
From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Bruce Depalma & "Free Energy
> >> The funny think is that the N-Machine is very very
> >> easy to test
>
> Shhh, don't tell that to Dr. Kincheloe, ***a Professor
> of Ele
wPhilip Winestone wrote:
> I have an intuitive feeling - totally
unsubstantiated - that the law of
> energy conservation is to energy, what Newton's
laws were to mechanics
> (or physics in general).
John Berry wrote:
> However this whole discussion is foolishness, you
can't get free energy
>
I-owe-gen, eh? > as in "I owe it all to genetics"
About --Iogen-- Cellulose Ethanol Enzyme Technology
Canadian "smarts" at work, eh Philip?
Probably w/o the need for an ice-cold catalyst either: i.e. of the
Molson's variety... yet they should still hire Mike Myers to do a little
PR work for
On 1/21/07, Philip Winestone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(And we too have our major sources of inertia... We call it collectively,
"the government.")
"Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down.
Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy
knowl
I have an intuitive feeling - totally unsubstantiated - that the law of
energy conservation is to energy, what Newton's laws were to mechanics (or
physics in general).
I mean you can take a pound of any explosive and explain that the energy
from that explosive is a direct (measurable) result o
Well enlighten us ! Can you name the company and the enzyme, please.
The company in Ottawa is Iogen (that's an "I" not an "L"), but I'm afraid I
didn't go so far as to find out the name of the enzyme; I've been remiss.
(And we too have our major sources of inertia... We call it collectivel
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:00:17 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Because it doesn't. It's a magnetic motor -- permanent-magnet-based
engine -- and there's no mechanism for it to "steal heat" from the
environment, nor any evidence whatsoev
19 matches
Mail list logo
