Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Paul's message of Sun, 21 Jan 2007
09:05:43 -0800 (PST):
Hi Paul,
[snip]
If you place a load on
the both air coils you can collect
such energy. That's why pure inductors dissipate
zero
energy; i.e., energy goes in the
inductor in the form of
Paul wrote:
Present science has *no idea* how, why, or what sustain the
magnetic dipole moment of the electron.
FWIW - Hal Puthoff seems to have a pretty good mathematical
understanding of this, but one suspects that is not easy for him or
anyone else to put that into words - other than
Paul wrote:
wPhilip Winestone wrote:
I have an intuitive feeling - totally
unsubstantiated - that the law of
energy conservation is to energy, what Newton's
laws were to mechanics
(or physics in general).
John Berry wrote:
However this whole discussion is foolishness, you
can't get
http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/18086/
The first two comments, at the end of the article, are interesting
regarding the technology, but are not dispositive of whether or not this
company is for real with the Bettery.
Also General Motors recently announced ties and commitments to
Jones Beene wrote:
Paul wrote:
Present science has *no idea* how, why, or what
sustain the
magnetic dipole moment of the electron.
FWIW - Hal Puthoff seems to have a pretty good
mathematical
understanding of this, but one suspects that is not
easy for him or
anyone else to put
Paul wrote:
Perhaps his math and theories are online? Where does he believe
the energy comes from? I've theorized it comes from the sea of energy we call
time-space. Some referred to it as ZPE, quantum foam, or Aether.
Yup. You are plowing the same field as Puthoff did twenty years ago.
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
[snip]
It's certainly complicated; too complicated to
solve easily
and too complicated to model mentally with a simple
picture.
Very true! That's why computers are so wonderful.
IMHO the future of science is held
within the computer, as they are great with
Paul wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
[snip]
It's certainly complicated; too complicated to
solve easily
and too complicated to model mentally with a simple
picture.
Very true! That's why computers are so wonderful.
IMHO the future of science is held
within the computer, as they are
--- Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In reply to Paul's message of Sun, 21 Jan 2007
09:05:43 -0800 (PST):
Hi Paul,
[snip]
If you place a load on
the both air coils you can collect
such energy. That's why pure inductors dissipate
zero
energy; i.e., energy goes in the
Hello Stephen,
IMHO this is an interesting topic.
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Paul wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
[snip]
It's certainly complicated; too complicated to
solve easily
and too complicated to model mentally with a
simple
picture.
Very true! That's why
Harvey Norris wrote:
Transcending Reactive vs Real Power Concepts.
Sun May 29, 2005
As most of us know the REASON that we cannot simply
multiply the voltage times the amperage, (VI)
[snip]
That's a nice detailed explanation of inductors.
Although I snipped it due to text length.
At any
On 1/22/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong. To put it bluntly, GM will be the last auto company on the planet
to find the cutting edge of anything new and promising - at least if
they cannot control the company at the Board level. They are a dying
giant on a downward spiral to
On 1/22/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW - Hal Puthoff seems to have a pretty good mathematical
understanding of this, but one suspects that is not easy for him or
anyone else to put that into words - other than three-letter acronyms.
Sign in Marshall SFC, Huntsville (true
On 1/22/07, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where does he believe
the energy comes from?
Simple answer: the other side of zero.
Terry
Let's suppose you have a circular magnetic gradient of 1 gauss per
degree which delivers 1 Nm of torque to a rotor. Further suppose
that, at the discontinuity of the gradient, you kick the rotor of a
motor past the sticky spot with a mechanical force.
Now you increase the gradient by a factor
Paul wrote:
Hello Stephen,
IMHO this is an interesting topic.
I won't argue with that!
If you're ever in a room full of physicists and you want to start an
argument, ask if magnetic fields ever do work. Then, after you've
gotten a few of them to say, loudly, No, never!, ask what does
Terry Blanton wrote:
Let's suppose you have a circular magnetic gradient of 1 gauss per
degree which delivers 1 Nm of torque to a rotor. Further suppose
that, at the discontinuity of the gradient, you kick the rotor of a
motor past the sticky spot with a mechanical force.
Could you use a
Hi,
Where hot rocks are available as a source of geothermal power, and these are
situated near the coast, salt water could be used as the water source. This
would produce steam to drive turbines, which could then also be condensed into
fresh water. In short rather than be an additional burden on
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:18:09 -0500:
Hi Terry,
[snip]
Let's suppose you have a circular magnetic gradient of 1 gauss per
degree which delivers 1 Nm of torque to a rotor. Further suppose
that, at the discontinuity of the gradient, you kick the rotor of a
motor
My mind is stimulated by the idea. There are a lot of
minerals in the underground rocks. Sea salt and
underground salts could be continuously or periodically
carried to the the surface dissolved and suspended in
superheated water which would be evaporated on the surface
leaving the salts. A
20 matches
Mail list logo
