Jed Rothwell wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
One of their contributors is Mark Mills who is possibly the stupidest
individual I have ever come across. He vies for that title with the
anti-cold fusion flack Nate Hoffman.
Gary Taubes is several tacos short of a platter, but he is cunning and
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
Second, this would put the Energy Fund beyond the reach of the
taxpayers, where no publicly funded organization should
They answer to no one, and they waste billions of dollars mainly on
lunatic environmental destruction: megaprojects that dump
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
This makes a lot of sense, but how will the public vote between CF
and Joe Newman's machine or any other fringe research in practice?
Via some reality television program? (why not) And who/what will
guide their choice?
The public will have to
On May 30, 2007, at 10:56 PM, thomas malloy wrote:
I remember back in the '70's it appeared that the Japanese model of
picking emerging technologies, and then making investments of
public money was going to kick our butts, but they are in worse
shape then we are.
Despite their
On May 29, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 29 May 2007 12:28:49
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Regarding D + Pd cold fusion cathode conditions, Hora and Miley write
[1]: The screened deuterons are mutually repulsed by their Coulomb
field at
thomas malloy wrote:
IMHO, a simpler explanation is that they were in Greenland during
the wrong part of the 1600 year global heating and cooling cycle and
froze to death.
The climate change helped do them in, but they were not killed by a
single cold winter. The decline was gradual, over
thomas malloy wrote:
Amazing story Jed. Thank you for sharing it. Would it be fair to say
that they are attempting to make a Japanese garden out of the country?
They are attempting to convert the entire country into an ecological
wasteland. Not just attempting; they are succeeding on an
Well Jed,
Your recent rant against Exxon seems well placed.
See:
http://www.resourceinvestor.com/pebble.asp?relid=32431
steve
--
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
OrionWorks wrote:
Well Jed,
Your recent rant against Exxon seems well placed.
See:
http://www.resourceinvestor.com/pebble.asp?relid=32431
This news item says that Exxon has decided not to diversify into wind
energy , solar energy and so on, and they are bucking the trend set
by BP and
See:
Pentagon Agency Looks to Fund Cold Fusion, Isomers, Antimatter
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/05/pentagon_agency.html
http://www.wkyc.com/video/player.aspx?aid=35660bw
Howdy Zac,
Another link
Richard
Zac might want write to former Vo - Ron Wormus - who may still be
tuned-in on occassion.
Ron is/was very knowledgeable on the electronic aspects of this
technology - at least insofar as testing the tubes with various gas
fills under RF stimulation - he was more into looking for hydrino
Hey Vorts,
Anyone seen this thing from Borbas on newelectrogravity?
http://www.fw.hu/bmiklos2000/unipolar.htm
Him and afew people on newelectrogravity think this thing in the biefeld
brown effect or something like that and that its a space drive. It looks like
the pinwheel
Jones,
I still keep up with Vo though I don't post very often. I have spent
quite a lot of time effort experimenting with the RIFE effect over
the last few years come to the conclusion that there are real
verifiable biological effects from RF modulated plasmas. However, like
LENR,
what would you say to bedini's work on replicating rife's material?
http://www.icehouse.net/john34/rife.html
http://www.icehouse.net/john34/rife2.html
On 01/06/07, Ron Wormus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jones,
I still keep up with Vo though I don't post very often. I have spent
quite a lot of
15 matches
Mail list logo
