Vortexians;
While researching Orgone accumulators I happened upon Zephyr
Technology's website. They are offering this gadget for sale,
http://www.zephyrtechnology.com/UFO_Technology/ufo_technology.html
It looses some weight, the man I talked to said that it's operation is
based on Benfield
Jed Rothwell wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Most importantly don't over look what you can do about anthropogenic
climate change if it is happening, A: not a damn thing!
Oh give us a break, Tom! At least you can say: I don't want to pay to
fix the problem. Or: I do not feel like paying an
Vortexians;
In reading the article on one galaxy eating another, I came across this
link, which I found interesting. Particularly the word barycenter, I've
never considered what a fluxiating barycenter of a plasma ball might
result in. http://viewzone.com/endtime.html
---
Ah, you were counting on the ground around, it makes sense now, but then you
must make sure there is some, e.g. your plate mustn't be more than two or three
times as wide as the gap distance and mustn't cover the table entirely,
otherwise the only ground your emitter will see is the plate, or
Fascinating (if not wildly overreaching) conclusions. Perfect for this
forum ;-)
Especially the Maya calender bit ... and the Russian preparations for same:
http://viewzone.com/yamantau.html
Jones
Zachary Jones wrote:
Vs,
Hope this isn't considered to be to off-topic, but with our lists
On Jun 26, 2007, at 5:20 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Zachary Jones wrote:
Vs,
Hope this isn't considered to be to off-topic, but with our lists
connection to antigrav tech I thought this piece would offer nice
perspective to the sibling-discussion of alien life. This is,
really, a tasty
Charles M. Brown wrote:
The diode array is progressing. A backer is willing to invest in
nanoprototyping. There is some difficulty in that electron beam
lithography is slow at ~ 1 / 3 second per 50 nm spot so the prototype
will be microscopic with ~ 10,000 diodes. In the future, a stamp pad of
On Jun 26, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Ah, you were counting on the ground around, it makes sense now,
but then you must make sure there is some, e.g. your plate mustn't
be more than two or three times as wide as the gap distance and
mustn't cover the table entirely,
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 7:04 PM
...
But anyway the slit plate experiment is better, it doesn't count on
the ground around and it works in steady state.
It's quite easy to measure a small DC current BTW, all you need
On Jun 26, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
--
About the low current phenomenon, it occurs to me that a
sufficiently low current ion stream, where the ions would form a
clearly discrete dotted line rather than a continuous-looking
stream, would not expand sideways by
Can you run your car on an Apple?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?view=DETAILSgrid=xml=/earth/2007/06/21/eacarbon121.xml
http://snipr.com/1nl47
Scientists manage to turn sugar into fuel
By Roger Highfield, Science Editor
Last Updated: 12:01am BST 21/06/2007
A way of turning
My (possibly wrong) hypothesis is that the field is so low that the ions only
emanate from the highest field point of the tip, so they just follow the
particular field line which starts from there and ends at the nearest point of
the plate, and that there is so much space between successive
On Jun 26, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Michel Jullian wrote:
My (possibly wrong) hypothesis is that the field is so low that the
ions only emanate from the highest field point of the tip, so they
just follow the particular field line which starts from there and
ends at the nearest point of the
--
Michel
If we assume 10^-9 amp, that's 6.24x10^9 electrons per second. If we
assume a 10 cm path length and 100 kph ion speed we have a transit
time of (10 cm)/(100 kph) = 0.0036 sec., thus (6.24x10^9 q/s)(0.0036
s) = 2.25x10^7 electrons in the path. That gives a separation of (10
cm)/(2.25x10^7
15 matches
Mail list logo
