Horace wrote:
Suppose the DC power supply, a battery, carries a coulomb of excess
positive charge, or a coulomb of excess negative charge?
Charge can always be detected by the field that is around it - provided
you can get "around" it to measure! Gauss's law (I think it is) says
that if y
I seldom write anything right the first time through, despite proof
reading. Sigh.
I wrote: "But, as you point out, this is not true if you get well
away from that center line (and you are well out in space where there
is no field from the universe.) Then the absolute net charge on the
p
On Aug 13, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Interesting exchanges.
If a pair of wires are 3 x 10^10 cm long; and, a potential is applied
to the ends of the wires with a load resistor on the other end, I have
two simple questions:
1) How much time passes before the first electron drifts
Terry Blanton wrote:
For the first time, I honestly think that the end *IS* near. Did we
finally win?
http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/13/autos/electric_car/index.htm?cnn=yes
There are actually a plethora of BEVs about to enter the market. Time
to start an electrical install company for 220 VAC
Not simple of course :-) Without going into the details it may be something
like:
1) 1 second (3 x 10^10 cm at light speed) + load entrance to load center
drifting time at electron speed in load (slow, I would think it can be
determined based on the current, on the load's cross section area, an
For the first time, I honestly think that the end *IS* near. Did we
finally win?
http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/13/autos/electric_car/index.htm?cnn=yes
There are actually a plethora of BEVs about to enter the market. Time
to start an electrical install company for 220 VAC chargers!
Terry
1) Should read ". . . first electron outside the load drifts . . ."
On 8/13/07, Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting exchanges.
>
> If a pair of wires are 3 x 10^10 cm long; and, a potential is applied
> to the ends of the wires with a load resistor on the other end, I have
> tw
Interesting exchanges.
If a pair of wires are 3 x 10^10 cm long; and, a potential is applied
to the ends of the wires with a load resistor on the other end, I have
two simple questions:
1) How much time passes before the first electron drifts through the
load center point assuming the load is on
On Aug 13, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Horace,
You seem to feel you must rely exclusively on measures of voltage and
amperage to determine the absolute charge.
These are the common instruments at hand, and I think they are good
enough, though they aren't even necessary to accom
On Aug 13, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
HH: Keep working at it Jones and you will eventually arrive at my
deflated hydrogen scenario.
Horace,
Let men say that, yes, this similar concept of faux-beta-decay is
totally derivative of recent postings to Vortex, ...
[snip]
I am not see
On 13/8/2007 11:08 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Horace Heffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To:
>> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 4:40 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Only potential differences matter
>>
Whether the DC power supply has excess charge itself or not, if it can apply
the desired voltage difference between the electrodes (which you can check with
a voltmeter), then the expected surface charges (one net positive, the other
net negative) will be there at the facing surfaces, in accorda
Anybody remember the Apple "Pippin" ? ...a so-called portable computer
from 1989.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_Portable
http://www.macsimumnews.com/index.php/archive/apple_pippin_apple_portable_make_worst_tech_products_list
It is somewhat of an embarrassment to Apple today, most likel
HH: Keep working at it Jones and you will eventually arrive at my
deflated hydrogen scenario.
Horace,
Let men say that, yes, this similar concept of faux-beta-decay is
totally derivative of recent postings to Vortex, many by you, some by
Robin and some by Michel and others going back to the Mi
On Aug 13, 2007, at 8:12 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
It depends on a transitory state of a proton bound with a resonant
electron - which electron is far more energetic than normal, and
which bound-state can be as short as nanoseconds. Mills hydrino is
long-lived.
Keep working at it Jones a
On Aug 13, 2007, at 7:44 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
1. Is it possible to establish a condition where it is certain there
are more negative charges than positive at some point P on a given
plate surface?
2. Is it possible to establish a condition where it is certain there
are more positive ch
As far as I know, Joe Newman was the first to create a small stir with
the "dead battery" swapping-and-reviving routine. It does work, no doubt
about that.
John Bedini came along and got most of the credit, but still few experts
believe that there is anything to it - other than can be explaine
On Aug 13, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Horace Heffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Only potential differences matter
On Aug 13, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Measuring relat
- Original Message -
From: "Horace Heffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Only potential differences matter
>
> On Aug 13, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
>
>>> Measuring relative surface potentials between two
>>> electro
- Original Message -
From: "Horace Heffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Only potential differences matter
>
> On Aug 13, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
>
>>> Measuring relative surface potentials between two
>>> electro
Dear Horace,
The book is available from www.worldscientific.com and can be obtain by
airmail in a few days. The books being distributed by WalMart are in
transit from Singapore were they are printed.
Ed
Horace Heffner wrote:
Walmart last notified me the shipping date was July 28, 2007 for
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
thomas malloy said;
The idea is to use the potential to cause the oxygen and hydrogen to
pull apart, not to muscle in an electron. That's the way a Faraday
electrolyzer works.
So you are saying the Boyce cell does not work by Oxidation-Reduction
reaction?
I don
On Aug 13, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Measuring relative surface potentials between two
electrodes simply doesn't tell you if there are excess surface
electrons on one or both or neither. It still seems pretty obvious
to me.
You can say that three times it won't make it true, wh
On Aug 13, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Measuring relative surface potentials between two
electrodes simply doesn't tell you if there are excess surface
electrons on one or both or neither. It still seems pretty obvious
to me.
You can say that three times it won't make it true, wh
> Measuring relative surface potentials between two
> electrodes simply doesn't tell you if there are excess surface
> electrons on one or both or neither. It still seems pretty obvious
> to me.
You can say that three times it won't make it true, whatever Lewis Carroll says
;-)
Come on, w
25 matches
Mail list logo
