Re: [Vo]:Continued Adventures in Celestial Mechanics

Thank you, Steven Vincent Johnson for the insight and energy to publish your new year adventures in a category of science little appreciated. Richard

[Vo]:Re: Nanosolar and Rare Elements

Michael Foster wrote: Considering that indium and gallium are already experiencing a geometric price rise, I don't think the future of Nanosolar looks too bright. Research into photovoltaics not depending on such scarce metals should be a priority. ...Graphene to the rescue ??? http://tinyur

Re: [Vo]:Stimulated nuclear reactions by Claus Rolfs

On Jan 5, 2008, at 12:24 PM, David Jonsson wrote: Hi Check http://www.ioppublishing.com/Media/Press%20Releases/press_6762.html and tell me what you think. Is the method similar to the one previously mentioned here with electrostatic methods? David With regards to catalyzing fusion, thi

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cold Fusion-Treated Palladium-Lithium-Boron Laser Fusion Target Factory

Horace Heffner wrote: snip We can debate all day about what the arrangement of electrons looks like and how they might in theory behave. Nevertheless, if electrons can in fact gain the required 0.78 MeV from their surroundings to make a neutron, why is this process not detected? Th

Re: [Vo]:Heisenberg and Mills

In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 6 Jan 2008 06:02:39 -0900: Hi, [snip] >>> If that were true then the de Broglie wavelength would be irrelevant >>> to any consideration and interference would be impossible because the >>> de Broglie wavelength existence would only be in the direction o

Re: [Vo]:The OC Magnetic Perpetual Motion Machine

Terry Blanton wrote: >Personally, I think it's for real. I've been reading these guys' >posts for over a year. Well, I respect Terry's judgment, but if it were not for that I would pay no attention. There have been countless magnetic motor claims and they all seem to come to nothing. If this w

Re: [Vo]:Nanosolar and Rare Elements

All the more reason to fetch some meteoroids as many have a high content of these rare elements. Terry On Jan 6, 2008 1:24 PM, Michael Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's an interesting article concerning rare elements and the world economy. > > http://www.science.org.au/nova/newscientist/

[Vo]:Nanosolar and Rare Elements

Here's an interesting article concerning rare elements and the world economy. http://www.science.org.au/nova/newscientist/027ns_005.htm An excerpt: = Armin Reller, a materials chemist at the University of Augsburg in Germany, and his colleagues are among the fe

Re: [Vo]:Stimulated nuclear reactions by Claus Rolfs

David Jonsson wrote: Hi Check http://www.ioppublishing.com/Media/Press%20Releases/press_6762.html and tell me what you think. Is the method similar to the one previously mentioned here with electrostatic methods? David Have you ever heard of the LENT reactor? It made some radionuclides non

Re: [Vo]:Cost of gasoline with oil at $100/barrel

On Thursday 03 January 2008 16:54, Jed Rothwell wrote: > leaking pen wrote: > > >http:// www.energy.ca.gov/gasoline/whats_in_barrel_oil.html > > This shows that one barrel of crude oil is about 51% gasoline, 15% > distillate fuel, and s

Re: [Vo]:Heisenberg and Mills

On Jan 5, 2008, at 7:01 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:57:02 -0900: Hi, [snip] True, but one is not free to choose the radial direction, because that is perpendicular to the path of the electron (and hence it's momentum). IOW whatev

[Vo]:Another SMOT Test

Without the magnets: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5D70lqT1ZU With: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNFS63dZIdc Terry

Re: [Vo]:Heisenberg and Mills

In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:57:02 -0900: Hi, [snip] >> True, but one is not free to choose the radial direction, because >> that is >> perpendicular to the path of the electron (and hence it's >> momentum). IOW >> whatever dimension one chooses, both momentum and