CMNS/LENR Online Resource Index
(Please
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/LENR%20Resource%20Indexnotify
us of any changes or updates)
http://newenergytimes.com/weblinks/weblinks.htm
(HUP = Heinsenberg's Uncertainty Principle).
Back to my DIESECF (Desorbing vs Incident Excess Surface Electron Catalyzed
Fusion) speculation for a moment, forwarding a post I made to the CMNS group
today, in response to a sensible objection by X (names hidden).
Michel
- Original Message
Nice! Just one thing Steve, our host Bill --although it can't be taken from him
that he is a mad scientist-- isn't a Chemistry professor is he?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Steven Krivit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 9:23 AM
Subject:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008, Edmund Storms wrote:
I'm confused. Perhaps someone on this list has the
answer. Everyone who has discussed the issues here seems
to agree to the following:
1. Increase in energy cost will drive up food and other
commodity prices, which will reduce consumer spending.
2.
Even within classical physics the existence of a point charge is
problematic.
(as well as point masses.) Do you mean charge density at a point?
Harry
On 20/4/2008 6:49 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
(HUP = Heinsenberg's Uncertainty Principle).
Back to my DIESECF (Desorbing vs Incident Excess
Michel Jullian wrote:
Indeed Vorts we can do better than this: zero ship time!
We already found how to seed/fertilize directly from land (e.g. from the
Azores, cf quoted post below).
But _even harvesting_ could be done without any ship: we could install a fixed
harvesting robot, or cluster
Here is information on a small but extremely powerful
engine, which is in production for military use, and
weighing only ~10 kilograms (22 lbs) for what is the
equivalent of nearly 30 kilowatts output. This is an
ideal size and power for the concept below (which is
not original, but I do not know
In reply to Taylor J. Smith's message of Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:58:37 +:
Hi,
[snip]
I'm sure if lemmings could
talk, they would have very good reasons for marching into
the ocean.
[snip]
Apparently that film was a fake. Lemmings don't actually march into the ocean.
It seems only humans are that
--- Robin wrote:
This is the key faulty assumption. It is not 1 V. It
is 1.48 V (and that is per hydrogen atom, not per
molecule). Hence the energy input is at least 2 x 1.48
x 96.5 kJ = 285 kJ, i.e. just what you get out of
burning it. Sorry, no free lunch.
Yes, although you can get a few
Apologies to Maj Hathaway who apparently started the
original posting to this thread, which for some reason
I did not receive, but read it just now in the
archives.
I suspect that he was actually present at the Jarboe
event in Maryland, and can fill us in on anything
which was demonstrated there,
10 matches
Mail list logo
