2008/10/16 Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Oct 16, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
But if you get closer and closer to a finite disk of charge, whether
on-axis or off-axis, it will look more and more like an infinite
sheet of charge, because the 1/r^2 law makes the effect of
On Oct 16, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Michel Jullian wrote:
2008/10/16 Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Oct 16, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
But if you get closer and closer to a finite disk of charge, whether
on-axis or off-axis, it will look more and more like an infinite
sheet
This is a rehash and update on a little economic theory idea.
On Feb 8, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
Within the context of the mortgage industry debacle precipitated
financial crisis it appears there is something even more sinister
making for the crazy markets:
I don't disagree with most of what you say here, but the drop in money
supply is something which can be accounted for conventionally. I had
a couple comments, which I'll give out of order.
Horace Heffner wrote:
This theory seems to be working out to some degree. It appears M has
been
Howdy Horace,
Ever get the feeling there's somebody out there who's a whole lot smarter
then us ole boys standing at the bar at the Dime Box watching a rerun of
9-11 towers falling?
Conspiracy theorists see malevolence in matching buy and sells in the
dark, says Larry Tabb, founder of the TABB
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/16/technology/start-ups/16tesla.html
Tesla Says It Will Lay Off Employees and Delay Its All-Electric Sedan
Until 2011
By CLAIRE CAIN MILLER
SAN FRANCISCO — Tesla Motors, an electric car start-up in Silicon
Valley, said Wednesday that it would lay off employees and
There is an evolving theory, more like an evolving semanics, of what aether
is.
Lets begin with ZPE and its main proponent. Puthoff, without necessarily
endorsing an aether by name, has said that there is a dynamic equilibrium
(the ZPF) which stabilizes the electron in a set ground-state
To any one who might be interested, Steve quoted me in the latest
issue of NET as follows:
For example, LENR researcher Ed Storms, retired from Los Alamos
National Laboratory, recently discouraged me from reporting all of the
key facts of LENR research. He wrote this to me in an e-mail
On Oct 17, 2008, at 4:50 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
I don't disagree with most of what you say here, but the drop in money
supply is something which can be accounted for conventionally. I
had
a couple comments, which I'll give out of order.
Horace Heffner wrote:
This theory seems
If things are damped enough for current liquidity efforts to take
effect without causing other problems, then it seems to me a major
initial underlying problem, i.e. the drop in housing values below
loaned amounts, will be fixed far faster than most realize ...
through inflation. We'll be
It couldn't be easier! See:
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/how-to-steal-an-election-with-a-diebold-machine-200693.php
- Jed
Edmund Storms wrote:
Jed, do you still think these flaws were accidental, a result of
incompetence, or just sloppy design? Do you think the Republicans are
not out to steal the election if they could?
Indeed.
There was a lot of noise on the Internet after the 2004 election about
the
Edmund Storms wrote:
Jed, do you still think these flaws were accidental, a result of
incompetence, or just sloppy design?
Well, naturally I have my suspicions. Who wouldn't? But I still think
that I cannot know the answer to this question without evidence. I
mean evidence that would stand
Whoa -
Do you think the Republicans are not out to steal the election if they could?
Why them and not the Dems?
I do not think either party has a monopoly on dishonesty or dirty tricks.
Now that the machine has been reversed engineered, etc. and done so at
Universities - (where there is a
Jones Beene wrote:
Do you think the Republicans are not out to steal the election if
they could?
Why them and not the Dems?
Well, in recent history going back to Nixon and the plumbers,
Republicans have been more inclined to cheat than Democrats. Or at
least, they have gotten caught more
On Oct 17, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Whoa -
Do you think the Republicans are not out to steal the election if
they could?
Why them and not the Dems?
In this case, the owner of Diebold was a strong supporter of the
Republicans. This requires the Democrats to use other
16 matches
Mail list logo
