Mike,
I have mentioned this several times. What, if anything do you want to
do with the paper I wrote at your house titled Responses to DoE
Review Panel Comments. It is sitting on my desk gathering digital dust.
People have not submitted papers to LENR-CANR lately and I do not
feel like
Oops. I sent that to the wrong address. However, anyone who would
like to help me untangle Mengoli is welcome to contact me. I will
send you a copy and you can try to figure this out.
- Jed
FYI, the Mike in that message is Mike Melich and the Mengoli paper
is excellent -- despite the confusing notation -- but I am not
allowed to upload it to LENR-CANR.org, because of copyright
restrictions. We do not have any Mengoli papers. It is a darn shame.
I am thinking of writing a review
Okay, I figured out the notation in this Mengoli
paper, that I accidentally discussed here this morning. Title:
Mengoli, G., et al., Calorimetry close to the
boiling temperature of the D2O/Pd electrolytic
system. J. Electroanal. Chem., 1998. 444: p. 155.
The notation must be European I
I wrote:
Important results:
Table 3, describing run 3:
There are many other important results. I am
working on understanding run #3, or what they call Exp. 3 now.
Their comments:
3.2.3. Exp. 3
Pd strip cathode characteristics: dimensions,
(1.27 x 4.16 × 0.02) cm3; weight, 1.226 g.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The major achievement of this work is to have devised a temperature
range in which the generation of excess power is a totally reproducible
phenomenon. In fact, only a reproducible phenomenon can be investigated
successfully, due to its
The results look too good to be true, if excess heat of this magnitude
had been reproducible since 1998 the fight for recognition of CF
would have been won ten yrs ago obviously.
Regarding notation, with all the papers you've been editing I just
can't believe you can be so unit-challenged! In
Michel Jullian wrote:
The results look too good to be true
These people do excellent work. Melich and I have a high opinion of them.
These results are not too good at all; they are in line with Roulette,
Fleischmann and Pons' high heat results.
. . . if excess heat of this magnitude
had been
2009/5/7, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
I wrote:
This is rather frustrating to me. Here we have a
spectacular paper buried in the literature, and
unavailable on the net. Add to this the set of
papers edited and published in a hardback book by
Marwan and Krivit at last year's
In reply to grok's message of Thu, 7 May 2009 15:13:47 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The major achievement of this work is to have devised a temperature
range in which the generation of excess power is a totally reproducible
phenomenon. In fact, only a
10 matches
Mail list logo
