[Vo]:Gravitational Pair Creation article updated

2009-11-23 Thread Horace Heffner
My Gravitational Pair Creation article has been updated: http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/GravityPairs.pdf http://tinyurl.com/ybs8bhw The most significant update is the adding of this section: MORE ON MASS/ENERGY VACUUM EXCHANGES If particles are created in quartets then it is easy to see

[Vo]:DIY electrolytic cell / fuel cell rechargeable battery

2009-11-23 Thread Michel Jullian
See: http://sci-toys.com/scitoys/scitoys/echem/fuel_cell/fuel_cell.html I had no idea an ultraclean rechargeable battery could be done so simply! Supplies: - One foot of platinum coated nickel wire, or pure platinum wire. Since this is not a common household item, we carry platinum coated nickel

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion bombs

2009-11-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Taylor J. Smith wrote: Try Bible-dipping and find By their works you shall know them. Are they doing a terrible job? Do you think it is some accident that there has been very little US government funding for cold fusion research since the announcement by Pons and Fleischmann in 1989? Of

Re: [Vo]:DIY electrolytic cell / fuel cell rechargeable battery

2009-11-23 Thread Horace Heffner
On Nov 23, 2009, at 2:48 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: See: http://sci-toys.com/scitoys/scitoys/echem/fuel_cell/ fuel_cell.html I had no idea an ultraclean rechargeable battery could be done so simply! Supplies: - One foot of platinum coated nickel wire, or pure platinum wire. Since this is

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion bombs

2009-11-23 Thread Horace Heffner
On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:10 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Taylor J. Smith wrote: Try Bible-dipping and find By their works you shall know them. Are they doing a terrible job? Do you think it is some accident that there has been very little US government funding for cold fusion research since

[Vo]:updated my theory for relativistic fractional states

2009-11-23 Thread froarty572
The Hydrino as defined by Dr Randell Mills has a real fractional quantum state where the orbital is claimed to be smaller than the Bohr radius. Mills claim has been rejected by mainstream physics but an alternate theory by Jan Naudts was better received. Naudts proposed that hydrogen atoms

Re: [Vo]:Long interview with Taubes

2009-11-23 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 04:28 PM 11/22/2009, you wrote: What a creep! See: http://www.thedailybell.com/BellPage.asp?nid=604http://www.thedailybell.com/BellPage.asp?nid=604 Taubes is not too difficult to understand. Ambitious, and cold fusion was intended to be a book that could sell. He jumped to conclusions as

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion bombs

2009-11-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Horace Heffner wrote: The methods they use include things like: Ridicule in the mass media. Publishing books attacking the research. . . . . Let's not forget suppression of patents, at least in the US. That kills off industrial development and research investment within the US, at least

[Vo]:Sun Catalytix Gets $1M More from Polaris, Exclusive License

2009-11-23 Thread Horace Heffner
Sun Catalytix Gets $1M More from Polaris, Exclusive License: http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2003/split/648-1.html http://tinyurl.com/yk6vt5x Polaris Venture Partners has pumped an additional $1 million in seed capital into Cambridge, MA-based solar fuel startup Sun Catalytix, bringing

Re: [Vo]:Cold fusion bombs

2009-11-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Steven V Johnson wrote: I'm sure this was stated with tongue firmly implanted in cheek.;-) Not really. I'd bet even money someone is diddling with the Google's search engine. It would be pointless to speculate about who or why. My apologies if the following speculation has already been

Re: [Vo]:Long interview with Taubes

2009-11-23 Thread William Beaty
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Jed Rothwell wrote: What a creep! See: http://www.thedailybell.com/BellPage.asp?nid=604 His article fails the basic pseudoscience test ...and he even MENTIONS this test for detecting pseudoscience! It might seem quite bizarre at first. Don't people typically use the

Re: [Vo]:Long interview with Taubes

2009-11-23 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Beaty sez: What a creep! See: http://www.thedailybell.com/BellPage.asp?nid=604 His article fails the basic pseudoscience test ...and he even MENTIONS this test for detecting pseudoscience! It might seem quite bizarre at first. Don't people typically use the Golden Rule, and apply their

Re: [Vo]:Long interview with Taubes

2009-11-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
William Beaty wrote: It might seem quite bizarre at first. Don't people typically use the Golden Rule, and apply their criticism also to themselves? They do not, although countless guides to morality say they should. Such as: And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye,

[Vo]:Google search is back to normal

2009-11-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Ah. Google now finds the following search terms on the front page at LENR-CANR.org: defense intelligence agency cold fusion DIA-08-0911-003 But it still does not find the document itself. Coincidence? We report, you decide. By the way, some months ago, all mention of Robert Duncan's lecture

[Vo]:time dilation is already known to accumulate with changes in quantum fluctuations?

2009-11-23 Thread Frank
I thought I had to make the case for this in Casimir cavities and microwave waveguides but I found the paragraph below in an October 22nd blog Vacuum or zero point http://www.theimagineershome.com/blog/?p=2297 energy and quantum fluctuations that seems to indicate this is already known and

[Vo]:Science Magazine References NET Bubble Fusion Story

2009-11-23 Thread Steven Krivit
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2009/11/roundup-1123-ke.html

[Vo]:RE: NET Bubble Fusion Story

2009-11-23 Thread Mark Iverson
Errors found in final version, so far: Some of the affidavits suggest that Butt have [had] been subjected to coercion by the senior professors who were conducting the fact-finding. ...has been demonstrated to be out [missing] of it's jurisdiction. -Mark _ From: Steven Krivit

RE: [Vo]:RE: NET Bubble Fusion Story

2009-11-23 Thread Mark Iverson
I must be brain-dead... sorry 'bout that post. I obviously meant it to go to Steve... :-/ -Mark _ From: Mark Iverson [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 10:15 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:RE: NET Bubble Fusion Story Errors found in final

RE: [Vo]:RE: NET Bubble Fusion Story

2009-11-23 Thread Mark Iverson
yeah, I deserved that! :-) I was really trying to show all those OCD Vorts how few grammatical errors there are in your very lengthy, detailed, and fact-filled investigative articles! :-) -Mark _ From: Steven Krivit [mailto:stev...@newenergytimes.com] Sent: Monday, November 23,