On 28/11/09 10:55 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
http://www.physorg.com/news178178343.html
http://tinyurl.com/ylcn43s
Selected quotes:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ultimately, it's not clear that policy decisions have the capacity to
change the future course
On 28/11/09 12:54 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Not surprisingly, few within the Vort Collective (and
elsewhere) give much credence to STEORN's claims, particularly after the
disastrous Kinetica Museum demonstration flop conducted several years ago. I
myself have yet to
In regards to STEORN, I sez:
... I myself have yet to reconcile within myself how STEORN's engineers could
have gotten as far as they claim to have gotten with their alleged ORBO
technology, but then not have pre-tested the prototype within the same harsh
environment where it would go on
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Simon is a *sociologist,* Jed, not a chemist or physicist. Opinions
(especially collective opinions) and process are what the book is
about, not cold fusion. Or calorimetry.
If it is about opinions then we can conclude that opinions have no
bearing on cold fusion.
Many papers associate vacuum fluctuations with time dilation during pair
anti pair production but this is a balanced system so small and fleeting as
to appear isotropic to an observer at our scale. Einstein concluded that
time is dilated or always moves slower in a volume that contains a different
I wrote:
If it is about opinions then we can conclude that opinions have no bearing
on cold fusion. Plus we can conclude that sociologists are unqualified to
write about calorimetry, and they make fools of themselves when they try.
To put it more charitably, I guess what I am saying is that
6 matches
Mail list logo
