Jed sez:
It would not surprise me if Krivit as he went about performing
his investigations in preparation for NET#34 may have found himself
on more than one occasion privately entertaining speculation as to
whether certain CF scientists might have lied about the content of
their data.
He
The things Krivit accuses researchers of doing can only be lies, not
mistakes. They are too simple to be mistakes. And too blatant. For
example, he claimed the Italians were repeatedly misrepresenting
their numbers by a factor of 10, and that McKubre was publishing
hugely different numbers in
At 09:53 PM 5/25/2010, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
I spent a couple of days reviewing the Guide to
the Cosmos interview with Steve Krivit. I was
interested in comparing what was actually said
versus what certain individuals within the Vort
Collective seem to be implying Krivit
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
does. Ask him! He is not shy about speculating or accusing people.
I did ask him.
Have you personally asked him that question?
I haven't asked him anything lately. He told me he has added my
e-mail address to his kill file, and unsubscribed to Vortex, so I
At 11:40 AM 5/23/2010, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
I don't believe that Krivit did anyone a favor by calling current
cold fusion researchers liars. This field suffers from attacks at
all ends. We don't need an insider biting at us. When I went to see
Miley's talk at Wright Patterson AFB in the
Search for
HULU
In HULU search for
OUTER LIMITS ORGINAL
pick the movie
Decay of Strange Particles
I will take you back to the 50's will a sci fi view of nuclear reactions.
The mention of collective body interactions is interesting.
Frank Z
Found another Larsen radio interview 4/17/2010
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sandy-andrew/2010/04/17/widom-larsen-theory--energy-revolution-with-lewis-
I think his point regarding nuclear vs fusion In the first interview
may be the electron absorption transmutes a single nuclei vs the
Roarty, Francis X wrote:
Found another Larsen radio interview
4/17/2010
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sandy-andrew/2010/04/17/widom-larsen-theory--energy-revolution-with-lewis-http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sandy-andrew/2010/04/17/widom-larsen-theory--energy-revolution-with-lewis-
I think his
At 09:35 AM 5/26/2010, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Jed sez:
It would not surprise me if Krivit as he went about performing
his investigations in preparation for NET#34 may have found himself
on more than one occasion privately entertaining speculation as to
whether certain
At 09:49 AM 5/26/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The things Krivit accuses researchers of doing can only be lies, not
mistakes. They are too simple to be mistakes. And too blatant. For
example, he claimed the Italians were repeatedly misrepresenting
their numbers by a factor of 10, and that McKubre
At 09:49 AM 5/26/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The things Krivit accuses researchers of doing can only be lies, not
mistakes. They are too simple to be mistakes. And too blatant. For
example, he claimed the Italians were repeatedly misrepresenting
their numbers by a factor of 10, and that McKubre
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I tried to discuss the work with them and I had trouble finding
someone familiar with the project. I don't recall when Tom Passell
retired from EPRI. He is one of these Energizer Bunny people who
never stops working.
My analysis exactly. You'd have to ask the
At 10:31 AM 5/26/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
does. Ask him! He is not shy about speculating or accusing people.
I did ask him.
Have you personally asked him that question?
I haven't asked him anything lately. He told me he has added my
e-mail address to his
Clearly, I know nothing about the Windom-Larsen theory. I wrote:
Roarty, Francis X wrote:
. . .
I think his point regarding nuclear vs fusion In the first
interview may be the electron absorption transmutes a single nuclei
vs the fusion of 2 nuclei.
Ah. I guess that is negative beta
Frank,
Thanks for this. Not only is the HULU site a hoot for Sci-Fi aficionados .
. do not adjust your dial .
http://www.hulu.com/
.but the whole idea of collective body interactions rings of one of my
favorite side issues, not just in LENR but in life: . which is the
directed
I cast aspersions on the claim by Samuel E. Martin that he heard
someone on NHK use a particular grammatical form August 25, 1968.
Let me hasten to set the record straight here. I am not actually
engaged in a vendetta against Prof. Martin. That's a joke. I take his
word for what he heard on
At 02:41 PM 5/26/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Roarty, Francis X wrote:
Found another Larsen radio interview
4/17/2010
At 02:41 PM 5/26/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Roarty, Francis X wrote:
Found another Larsen radio interview
4/17/2010
18 matches
Mail list logo
