Terry Blanton wrote:
The spam filter is
personalized to your own settings, and things you have marked as spam
previously yourself.
I don't recall ever marking something on gmail as spam . . .
I do not think I have personalized the filter much. I think I marked
one or two messages as spam.
See:
Biberian, J.P., Condensed matter nuclear science (cold fusion): an
update. Int. J. Nucl. Energy Sci. Technol., 2007. 2(1): p. 31.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPcondensedm.pdf
Storms, E., Status of cold fusion (2010). Naturwiss., 2010. 97(10): p. 861-881.
I wrote:
It gives the advantage to old or elderly politicians who are have
lost of money and who think the Internet is a series of tubes.
I mean they have LOTS of money. That's gotta be a Freudian slip! Old
Japanese politicians are forever getting tangled up with financial
shenanigans. And
LOL - did anyone in the LENR field receive a visit from the MIB Saturday
morning?
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_16181812?source=most_viewed
Jones sez:
LOL - did anyone in the LENR field receive a visit from the MIB
Saturday morning?
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_16181812?source=most_viewed
Exerpt:
I couldn't believe, she said, that man was so valuable it took two men
with assault rifles to escort him to Livermore.
We're
Jed sez:
...
Okay, okay . . . I know that politics are not allowed here but it is
hilarious.
I thought the standard protocol when there may be some concern as to whether
a subject being discussed might be considered iffy is to prefix the subject
line with OT. You've certainly done that in the
Vorts,
The subject pertaining to this post is completely and utterly OFF TOPIC.
If you're not a cat owner, if you're not interested in the lives and deaths
of felines that share our lives, please feel free to skip this post. Be
forewarned, it was cathartically tinged to write.
* * * * * *
Terry Blanton wrote:
I only use gmail for vortex-l which would explain why I get no spam to
the inbox.
Do you get spam on your other account? It occurs to me that I have not seen
any for months, and the amount captured by the filter seems to be declining.
This is despite the fact that my
At 06:32 PM 9/27/2010, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Regarding Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's that we have turned the corner I
certainly agree that there have no substantive attacks in
peer-reviewed journals and science magazines lately. I haven't noticed any.
Even Sci. Am. has shut up. That may be Steve
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
WHO ARE YOU WORKING FOR If you don't cough up the details we won't
get paid. And I for one do not want to be unemployed.
No worries, a quick secure-satphone call to the Tesla pulsed-xray
wavecomplex-emitting global satellite
10 matches
Mail list logo
