Hence science progresses by funerals. :-)
T
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The human understanding, when any preposition has been once laid down,
(either from general admission and belief, or from the pleasure it affords,)
forces every thing else
Here is a note from my daughter:
Someone here at MIT pointed out this article by the recent Nobel Prize
winner. Specifically, who he credits as the the co-author of the article.
If this blog is right there is a 70% chance of an extinction event on 11/9/2010:
http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=125
Killed by negative strangelets.
T
The reference to ice-9 is probably a give-away as to where this one should
be filed ...
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Subject: [Vo]:We'll Never Make 2012
If this blog is right there is a 70% chance of an extinction event on
11/9/2010:
http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=125
Killed
That is about the stupidest thing I have ever read here on Vortex.
EINSTEIN: I think we might be forgetting the pesky problem that Albert's
anti-proponents numbered among the proponents of the 'then' 3rd-Reich who
eventually were desirous to 'suppress Albert to death.' And they
So we should all have died on the 11th of September? Arent we lucky
iPoni sent dis message. Esa Ruoho wrote it.
On 8.10.2010, at 17.59, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
If this blog is right there is a 70% chance of an extinction event on
11/9/2010:
http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=125
Per Jed: That is about the stupidest thing I have ever read here on Vortex.
* * *Add further to this than Einstein's 'NOBEL' was for Solar Voltaics and if
the BOMB had never been built, then the *recognized significance re:
Relativity* following the NOBEL for Einstein's Solar Voltaics
From: David Jonsson
Integral from -r0 to +r0 of (r0^2-r^2)/(R0-r)^2 dr
r0 is radius of star. R0 is distance to star center from a
satellite of the star.
The integral is most often approxiamted with something proportional to
1/R0² which is the case when r0 - 0. I think the
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:
So we should all have died on the 11th of September? Arent we lucky
Yanks put the month first.
T
well, at least a few people are saying about october-november being
EOTW-time. i look forward to seeing october end without major cataclysmic
events. i hope you do too.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Esa Ruoho
Gmail users beware. Vortex mail still seems to be dumping stuff into the
spam folder.
- Jed
some of jack's messages get dumped. big deal ;)
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Gmail users beware. Vortex mail still seems to be dumping stuff into the
spam folder.
- Jed
Apparently lots of people elsewhere on the Internet are experiencing
problems with Gmail spam filter false positives. In a discussion group,
someone recommended the following option for Gmail filters:
Never send it to Spam
I did not know they had that. My Filter entry now says:
Matches:
Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:
some of jack's messages get dumped. big deal ;)
Hey! Some of *my* messages get dumped. Bigger deal!
It seems that my Gmail filter is targeting messages from me. Perhaps because
a favorite tactic of spammers is to send a message to X with X spoofed as
sender.
Hey, I ticked 'not spam' on all of the one previously, and now I just
checked and none show in the spam filter.
So Jed, did you take this step?
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:
some of jack's messages get dumped. big
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:
well, at least a few people are saying about october-november being
EOTW-time. i look forward to seeing october end without major cataclysmic
events. i hope you do too.
Depends on what you might call a cataclysmic event. I
John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, I ticked 'not spam' on all of the one previously, and now I just
checked and none show in the spam filter.
So Jed, did you take this step?
I clicked not spam several times, rescuing several messages, but it kept
happening.
Just now I learned about
What is the next projected event after 13.10 goes MIA?
iPoni sent dis message. Esa Ruoho wrote it.
On 8.10.2010, at 22.53, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:
well, at least a few people are saying about
-Original Message-
From: Esa Ruoho
What is the next projected event after 13.10 goes MIA?
Well it is sure to happen on Oct 31, like it does every year ...
A guess is that the mailing software is doing something wrong. Why not make
a Google Group out of it instead?
David
David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, I
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
He talks about Hydrogen isotopes embedded in heavier atoms, then goes on
to suggest a new form of gravity to explain this.
A more likely explanation is a Hydrinohydride ion displacing one of the
inner electrons of the heavy atom ...
Wow,
21 matches
Mail list logo
