[Vo]:A Power Factor Corrected Tesla Coil System.

2011-01-11 Thread Harvey Norris
It now becomes possible to demonstrate such a proposition, where formerly the problematic distinctions of how such a problem should be approached deemed the subject a spurious supposition. The "power factor correction" principle only applies to interactions involving source frequency, and the T

[Vo]:vixra.org

2011-01-11 Thread Harry Veeder
An alternative to arxiv.org http://vixra.org/ http://vixra.org/why "In part viXra.org is a parody of arXiv.org to highlight Cornell University's unacceptable censorship policy. It is also an experiment to see what kind of scientific work is being excluded by the arXiv. But most of all

Re: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-11 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 01/11/2011 04:43 PM, David Jonsson wrote: > Yes, under "effects of centripetal acceleration" which is by the way > an erroneous title since it should be centrifugal acceleration. Don't think so. In Newtonian terms, the acceleration's centripetal, caused by the centripetal force, which is pro

Re: [Vo]:Do we need a list of full-length books at LENR-CANR.org?

2011-01-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: > While organizing the poster I compiled the following list of full-length > books and other documents: > > 2004 DoE Review > BARC Studies > ICCF-9 Selected Papers > ICCF-10 Proceedings > ICCF-11 Proceedings > ICCF-12 Proceedings > Notable Papers in Our Collection > McKubre and Beaudette

Re: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-11 Thread David Jonsson
Yes, under "effects of centripetal acceleration" which is by the way an erroneous title since it should be centrifugal acceleration. What I write there is in its entirety: The denominator should use the sidereal day of 86 164.0905 seconds instead of 86 400 since inertia is relative the stars and n

Re: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-11 Thread Harry Veeder
Is this the right link? Harry > >From: David Jonsson >To: vortex-l >Sent: Tue, January 11, 2011 3:47:23 PM >Subject: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined > >Hi > > >Ain't I right? >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Standard_gravity#effect_of_centripetal_acceleration > > > >Sidereal period sh

[Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-11 Thread David Jonsson
Hi Ain't I right? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Standard_gravity#effect_of_centripetal_acceleration Sidereal period should be used and not solar. Do you support a change? David David Jonsson, Sweden, ph

[Vo]:Do we need a list of full-length books at LENR-CANR.org?

2011-01-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
I finally got a visa to go to India last week. It took two months. So I am going to the conference after all. I thought I would make a poster for the LENR-CANR.org website, and 50 copies of the web site on CD-ROM. While organizing the poster I compiled the following list of full-length books an

vortex-l@eskimo.com

2011-01-11 Thread Fran Roarty
Harvey, That is not input power vs output power but rather a case of transfer efficency. I^2R loss are greater in smaller diameter wire. If you know the input current and voltage you would have a more accurate total of the primary power consumed as wire loss + power transfered to the secon

RE: [Vo]:Entanglement as a topological manifestation

2011-01-11 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message- From: Mauro Lacy "... topologically speaking entanglement could be a hyperdimensional "Borromean ring" kind of link between particles." Apart from the earlier threads on Vortex on the implications of this structure to LENR - going back 4-5 years http://www.mail-archiv

Re: [Vo]:Entanglement as a topological manifestation

2011-01-11 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
>From Mauro: > We've have talked in the past about entanglement understood as an > hyperdimensional connection. > > According to this paper on "Efimov states", "Topologist Predicts New Form > of Matter" (http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26144/) > > "The deep and unworldly link between pa

[Vo]:Entanglement as a topological manifestation

2011-01-11 Thread Mauro Lacy
We've have talked in the past about entanglement understood as an hyperdimensional connection. According to this paper on "Efimov states", "Topologist Predicts New Form of Matter" (http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26144/) "The deep and unworldly link between particles in Efimov states i

Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Reifenschweiler papers are here: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Reifenschwreducedrad.pdf http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Reifenschwsomeexperi.pdf Atlanta is a terrible mess. I have not seen it this bad for years. It took me an an hour and a half to walk 3.5 miles. The main highway, 285, is half-cl

vortex-l@eskimo.com

2011-01-11 Thread Harvey Norris
Due to the large traffic on Yahoo Q&A, questions are seldom answered, so I am posting this here also. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtWqfhPwDpzsyH4C64Rs5_TCDH1G;_ylv=3?qid=20110111063659AAtvYS4 Can a superior amp-turn ratio made with air core primaries vs secondary lead to more hea