[Vo]:Call for papers: 2nd ISNPEDADM Conf.

2011-01-12 Thread William Beaty
Here's an upcoming conference on "New electrical technologies for environment." Looks like green electrostatics/plasma research. Abstracts deadline Apr 30th website http://lea.sp2mi.univ-poitiers.fr/noumeameeting/ Google maps (Aust NZ area) http://goo.gl/Ce4WA (

Re: [Vo]:OT: Why we have to teleport disbelief

2011-01-12 Thread Terry Blanton
"Help me!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqYDRxdgnC0

[Vo]:OT: Why we have to teleport disbelief

2011-01-12 Thread Harry Veeder
Why we have to teleport disbelief http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20927951.900-why-we-have-to-teleport-disbelief.html AS THE old saying goes, it's good to have an open mind but not so open that your brains fall out. This week we report claims about the way that DNA behaves that are

[Vo]:Thor's Hammer

2011-01-12 Thread Terry Blanton
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/01/lightning-antimatter-physics/ Thunderstorms Shoot Beams of Antimatter Into Space By Ron Cowen, Science News January 11, 2011 SEATTLE — Forget about gamma rays from the hearts of distant galaxies. Scientists now believe gamma rays, as well as beams of en

[Vo]:Aflockalypse?

2011-01-12 Thread Terry Blanton
Pole shift affects Tampa Airport http://www2.tbo.com/content/2011/jan/05/060831/shift-of-earths-magnetic-north-pole-impacts-tampa-/news-money/ Bird fall: http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/03/what-made-thousands-of-birds-fall-from-the-sky/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/06/birds-dying-in-

Re: [Vo]:Dark matter / galaxy rotation problem approached with simple classical physics

2011-01-12 Thread David Jonsson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote: > On 01/12/2011 07:38 PM, David Jonsson wrote: > > I have derived an effect which differs from Newton/Kepler orbits but > > with the wrong sign apparently increasing the problem even more. > > > > I would be glad if someone could check the calcu

Re: [Vo]:Dark matter / galaxy rotation problem approached with simple classical physics

2011-01-12 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 01/12/2011 07:38 PM, David Jonsson wrote: > I have derived an effect which differs from Newton/Kepler orbits but > with the wrong sign apparently increasing the problem even more. > > I would be glad if someone could check the calculations before I take > them further. It would also be nice to c

[Vo]:Dark matter / galaxy rotation problem approached with simple classical physics

2011-01-12 Thread David Jonsson
I have derived an effect which differs from Newton/Kepler orbits but with the wrong sign apparently increasing the problem even more. I would be glad if someone could check the calculations before I take them further. It would also be nice to calculate on some real example. http://djk.se/Dark%20m

Re: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-12 Thread David Jonsson
Using sidereal time instead of 86400 seconds lowers the value by 0.001 % and is thus very small. David David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370 On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote: > > > > > > On 01/11/2011 04:43 PM, David Jonsson wrote: > >> Yes, under "effects of cent

[Vo]:Re: 3rd Embodiment of the Wireless Tesla Coil;

2011-01-12 Thread Harvey Norris
Forgot to list the video URL; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC5sbV-1LmI Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ --- On Wed, 1/12/11, Harvey Norris wrote: > From: Harvey Norris > Subject: 3rd Embodiment of the Wireless Tesla Coil; > To

[Vo]:3rd Embodiment of the Wireless Tesla Coil;

2011-01-12 Thread Harvey Norris
The third embodiment is made by using another 2.4H/50 nf LC loop that instead is placed underneath the 266 primary; now making for two secondary air core tuned resonances on both polar areas of the 266 primary. As formerly noted by scopings the bottom magnetic field emission is lower then t

Re: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-12 Thread Mauro Lacy
> > > On 01/11/2011 04:43 PM, David Jonsson wrote: >> Yes, under "effects of centripetal acceleration" which is by the way >> an erroneous title since it should be centrifugal acceleration. > > Don't think so. In Newtonian terms, the acceleration's centripetal, > caused by the centripetal force, w