Vortex-L Rules:
1. $10/yr donation
2. NO SNEERING
3. KEEP MESSAGES UNDER 40K
4. DON'T QUOTE ENTIRE MESSAGES NEEDLESSLY
5. DON'T CC OTHER LIST SERVERS
6. NO SPAMMING
1. If VORTEX-L proves very useful or interesting to you, please consider
making a $10US/yr donation to help cover
On Jan 26, 2011, at 9:45 PM, Rich Murray wrote:
We have presented evidence that the proton may be considered as a
Schwarzchild entity... Nassim Haramein [oops, into nonduality...]:
Rich Murray 2010.01.26
When googling nassim haramein, I noticed that google suggested the
following
Yes, plenty of cogent criticism...
http://azureworld.blogspot.com/2010/02/nassim-haramein-fraud-or-sage-part-2.html
I am attracted to bright flashing lights...
Thanks, Rich
-- Forwarded message --
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
Date: Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:33 AM
On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:36 AM, Rich Murray wrote:
Yes, plenty of cogent criticism...
http://azureworld.blogspot.com/2010/02/nassim-haramein-fraud-or-
sage-part-2.html
I am attracted to bright flashing lights...
Thanks, Rich
When you post to vortex-l, please do not include my address in
The primary objection to such a radical explanation for Casimir effect and
catalytic action is that the equation for Casimir force at MINIMAL cavity
width provides results which are insufficient to explain the large time
dilations I am positing for the time period the hydrogen atoms remain inside
Francis:
I really think a better way to think about Relativistic Cavities is to think of
the time-axis shrinking, relative to the also reduced size of they particle
within the cavity. Shrinking the time axis, has the effect of accelerating the
velocity of travel along that axis, ie the
From http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/
Villa, M.,/On the gamma radiation measurements on the Rossi system/.
2011, Bologna University and INFN Sezione di Bologna.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/VillaMonthegamma.pdf
- Jed
Scott,
I like your model for the temporal aspect but I was choosing my
words carefully to make my points as intelligible as possible to the most
common denominator. I was also trying to make the point that there can be a
larger volume of space inside the cavity then the
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, G Shepherd wrote:
This is a source of some very good deals on items not even listed in many
physics equipment resources. I got some 4-5 lenses from them one time that
are hard to find. Their stock changes somewhat but is always interesting to
look through even if they
Shrinking the time axis is the same thing as augmenting the spacial axes if we
are defining distance as Velocity multiplied by time. Shrinking the time axis
means that more local time is traversed, requiring more distance. This is the
reverse of the Relativistic Twins: In this instance, the
Well guys, it looks like some heavy hitters are weighing in cavity-QED:
http://weirdsciences.net/2011/01/15/can-the-vacuum-be-engineered-for-space-f
light-applications-overview-of-theory-and-experiments/
Someone needs to update the Wiki entry. It is way too narrow in scope, given
what has
Scott,
OK its clear to me that You absolutely get it! But I was trying
to avoid the confusion when talking about velocity on a nonphysical axis -
the seeming conflicts and arguments I got early on caused me to write the
thread in the verbose manner that I chose for the benefit
Test. Please disregard.
Most was just rehash but the link to his article on quantum flux induced
gravity I will have to follow up on and see if we agree regarding my model of
the flux intersection rate being opposed by the nucleus and stretching space
time into tiny relativistic wells where electron orbitals chase
There are now over 320 comments on http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com...
Two caught my attention, the second one for all you theorists with a link to
arXiv doc!
-Mark
-- Comment 1 by Rossi -
By the way, we are manufacturing
Damn! What a coincidence.
I was just reading the Brown article.
I think he's got it almost cracked - Dipole attraction exactly cancels
monopole repulsion at very short H-H distances.
A must-read !
Jones
From: Mark Iverson [
-- Comment 2
http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol2.pdf#page=50
This is the way I got hold of it.
From: Jones Beene
Damn! What a coincidence.
I was just reading the Brown article.
I think he's got it almost cracked - Dipole attraction exactly cancels
monopole repulsion at very short H-H
Here's an article date 1/17/2011 about an experiment that achieved superluminal
velocities...
and not just a few times c, but 310c... that's 58 million miles/sec, or 93.0e9
m/s!
At that speed, it won't take too long for ET to get home!
E = k f^3 to Ideal Casimir formula
I can't account perfectly for all the changing constants---but this is pretty
close. See
http://z-pec.yolasite.com/resources/Short%20NSS%20Conference%20Paper.pdf
The following is a more recent paper on my perspectives on the Q FluxI have
to locate and
The J.S.Brown paper also says the following which is, I gather, pertinent to
LENR (obvious understatement):
It is hence reasonable to suppose that, once coherence has been established,
the height and width of the effective Coulomb barrier between neighbouring s, p
state pairs is reduced, with
This niche about dipole-dipole interactions could be even more important
within a Casimir cavity, especially if the cavity contains dense deuterium,
since the Brown parameters would presumable be closer together than he could
ever imagine.
The van der Waals interaction comes to mind as the sum
I'll comply! Thank, Rich
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:36 AM, Rich Murray wrote:
Yes, plenty of cogent criticism...
http://azureworld.blogspot.com/2010/02/nassim-haramein-fraud-or-sage-part-2.html
I am attracted to
From: Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, January 27, 2011 11:09:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...
Here's an article date 1/17/2011 about an experiment that achieved
superluminal
velocities...
and not just
23 matches
Mail list logo
