Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Harry Veeder
Mauro wrote: > I was just trying to emphasize, perhaps not a very good or > clear way, that there are no relative velocities of the two clocks involved. > >    What matters is that when the clocks are together and are both at rest in the same frame they are both ticking at the same rate. T

[Vo]:Gas property of constant motion can be exploited by catalysts

2011-04-23 Thread francis
Gas property of constant motion disassociates h2 in opposition to changes in Casimir force Is new blog with animation where I start to explore my nemesis. The math! http://alturl.com/aopjq Best Regards, Fran

[Vo]:If Rossi could speak freely, what would he say.

2011-04-23 Thread Axil Axil
*From Rossi Q&A April 21, 2011* * * *[quote]Q: What happens if by some defect the E-Cat during operation is not longer cooled by the water sourrounding it? How much would the temperature of the metal rise? Will the nuclear reaction stop due to high temperatures or will it be enhanced? In this cas

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Terry Blanton
There can be no absolute clock synchronization. Even the best of clocks, cesium beam standards, depend on the transition of a particular electron's orbit. The same space variations which are to be measured will vary the transition of the electron's time transition and the result differential will

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread jwinter
On 4/24/2011 6:13 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote: On 04/23/2011 06:57 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Perhaps you have overlooked a key point. How do you propose to synchronize clocks which are spatially separated? That's not a trivial question. Indeed, as Stephen rightly points out, that is the very ke

RE: [Vo]:Rossi's 1 MW reactor and the Russian K-7 Flying Fortress

2011-04-23 Thread Jones Beene
From: Jed Rothwell * * In my opinion, it is too early in the development of the Rossi reactor to scale up to 1 MW. The fact that they have changed the design from 100 to 300 units at this late date tells me the design is still in flux, and it may be late. More likely - it is the sa

[Vo]:ROSSI FAKE or REAL

2011-04-23 Thread Alan Fletcher
Yes, sorry ... it needs updating. (I have to insert form-feed commands manually, then run it through a script and then fix it in Acrobat. ) I'll fix it on Monday ... UNLESS, of course, there's a new report to evaluate! Alan ps : I just found out in another thread why my reply-to posts have bee

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 04/23/2011 06:59 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: On 04/23/2011 05:17 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote: On 04/23/2011 05:05 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: ... In short, according to Lorentz's theory, the aether can't be detected through velocity measurements. There is an "aether frame" but the

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 04/23/2011 06:57 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Perhaps you have overlooked a key point. How do you propose to synchronize clocks which are spatially separated? That's not a trivial question. ? You can synchronize them together, and separate them afterwards? On 04/23/2011 04:35 PM,

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 04/23/2011 05:17 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote: > On 04/23/2011 05:05 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: >> ... >> In short, according to Lorentz's theory, the aether can't be detected >> through velocity measurements. There is an "aether frame" but there is >> no way to tell how fast you're moving relati

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
Perhaps you have overlooked a key point. How do you propose to synchronize clocks which are spatially separated? That's not a trivial question. On 04/23/2011 04:35 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote: > On 04/23/2011 05:05 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > >> What you may not be aware of is that the final

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 04/23/2011 05:05 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: ... In short, according to Lorentz's theory, the aether can't be detected through velocity measurements. There is an "aether frame" but there is no way to tell how fast you're moving relative to it. Again: I'm not proposing taking any velo

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 04/23/2011 05:35 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote: On 04/23/2011 05:05 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: On 04/23/2011 10:14 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote: That way, absolute motion will be detected in the direction at which the time delta is greater. The light ray will take longer, travelling at a fixed

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 04/23/2011 01:53 PM, francis wrote: On Sat 4/23/11 Mauro wrote [SNIP] The proposed explanation is as follows: 1) Light is not "pushed" by the emitting device. It leaves the emitting device as a perturbation in the medium, and propagates at a fixed velocity. That velocity is dependant only o

[Vo]:Isotope difference: Rossi says Kullander is correct

2011-04-23 Thread Harry Veeder
  Luca * April 23rd, 2011 at 12:46 PM Hello, in a recent interview Focardi said: “Copper has two isotopes, the ratio of these two isotopes is not in the natural concentration, and copper is not added,have produced it in this way.” The italian sentence is: “Il rame ha due isotopi, il rapport

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 04/23/2011 05:05 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: On 04/23/2011 10:14 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote: That way, absolute motion will be detected in the direction at which the time delta is greater. The light ray will take longer, travelling at a fixed velocity, to reach the receiving device, because

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 04/23/2011 10:14 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote: > That way, absolute motion will be detected in the direction at which > the time delta is greater. The light ray will take longer, travelling > at a fixed velocity, to reach the receiving device, because the travel > distance in that direction will be gr

[Vo]:37- Number of research explosions

2011-04-23 Thread Harry Veeder
  Luke Mortensen April 22nd, 2011 at 4:06 PM AR, You’ve been working on these reactors for some time. Instead of asking about technical details which you cannot provide, perhaps you could tell us some of the *fun* parts of being an inventor. 1. What were a few of the most exciting moments as y

[Vo]:Rossi\'s 1 MW reactor and the Russian K-7 Flying Fortress

2011-04-23 Thread francis
Jed, Rossi may or may not agree with you but he has to mitigate his financial risk and probably needs a calculus formula to maximize his ROI/time with all sorts of soci-political considerations. My feeling is this timeline was adopted as the most expedient remedy - his odd behaviors

[Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread francis
On Sat 4/23/11 Mauro wrote [SNIP] The proposed explanation is as follows: 1) Light is not "pushed" by the emitting device. It leaves the emitting device as a perturbation in the medium, and propagates at a fixed velocity. That velocity is dependant only on the medium, and is c when the medium is

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's 1 MW reactor and the Russian K-7 Flying Fortress

2011-04-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Aaaand, here is a photo the remarkable Caproni Transaereo, intended to carry 100 passengers from Italy to New York in 1920: http://worstaircraft.netfirms.com/transaereo%20homepage.htm Text, from Yenne's book: http://worstaircraft.netfirms.com/caproni%20ca%2060.htm Well known to early aviation b

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's 1 MW reactor and the Russian K-7 Flying Fortress

2011-04-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
By the way, those pictures of the K-7 are computer generated images made recently, and somewhat fanciful, but you can find plenty of actual photos and information on the real K-7. That is more or less what it looked like. For more photos of improbable aircraft, see: http://www.amazon.com/Worlds-W

[Vo]:Rossi's 1 MW reactor and the Russian K-7 Flying Fortress

2011-04-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
In my opinion, it is too early in the development of the Rossi reactor to scale up to 1 MW. The fact that they have changed the design from 100 to 300 units at this late date tells me the design is still in flux, and it may be late. More to the point, it is sometimes a mistake to scale up technolog

Re: [Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 04/23/2011 11:14 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote: An experiment devised to detect absolute motion. Like I said in the past, the experiment is very simple in principle: To measure the time a ray of light takes to go from one direction to another, one-way. That is, without the return time. The total trav

[Vo]:Detecting absolute motion

2011-04-23 Thread Mauro Lacy
An experiment devised to detect absolute motion. Like I said in the past, the experiment is very simple in principle: To measure the time a ray of light takes to go from one direction to another, one-way. That is, without the return time. The total travel time is usually known as round-trip-t

Re: FW: [Vo]:Michaelson Morely vs V^2/C^2

2011-04-23 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 04/23/2011 09:46 AM, francis wrote: Perhaps M&M should have designed their experiment to look for change in catalytic rates. My premise is that the ether moves on the time axis equally displaced from all spatial dimensions [Neo Lorentzian]. Changes in this rate at which ether intersects with

Re: [Vo]:21 of april 2011 test

2011-04-23 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 04/23/2011 10:13 AM, Jones Beene wrote: Angela, You have already done that automatically by the new "Subject" heading. The software picks it up as a new thread, so please continue now, by replying to this. Alternatively, you can start a new Subject heading. It is automatic. That's incorre

RE: [Vo]:21 of april 2011 test

2011-04-23 Thread Jones Beene
Angela, You have already done that automatically by the new "Subject" heading. The software picks it up as a new thread, so please continue now, by replying to this. Alternatively, you can start a new Subject heading. It is automatic. Jones -Original Message- From: Angela Kemmler

Re: [Vo]:21 of april 2011 test

2011-04-23 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 04/23/2011 10:04 AM, Angela Kemmler wrote: sorry, i wanted to start a new thread. BTW, how to start a new one here? I have two new issues to talk about. Do not reply to a message, but instead compose a new one, and address it to vortex-l@eskimo.com. Regards, Mauro

Re: [Vo]:21 of april 2011 test

2011-04-23 Thread Angela Kemmler
sorry, i wanted to start a new thread. BTW, how to start a new one here? I have two new issues to talk about. -- GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

[Vo]:21 of april 2011 test

2011-04-23 Thread Angela Kemmler
There was a test the day 21 of april 2011 (last week, thursday). Hanno Essén is just writing a report. But i don't know when it will be published. This time, they measured the weight of the cooling water before and after the test. -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen!

FW: [Vo]:Michaelson Morely vs V^2/C^2

2011-04-23 Thread francis
Perhaps M&M should have designed their experiment to look for change in catalytic rates. My premise is that the ether moves on the time axis equally displaced from all spatial dimensions [Neo Lorentzian]. Changes in this rate at which ether intersects with our spatial axis are undetectable from w

[Vo]:Solar Energy splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen for fuel: Daniel Nocera, MIT

2011-04-23 Thread Esa Ruoho
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuE4k4mNQHc http://www.merlib.org/dan-nocera/ for a semi-random collection of articles over the years on Dan Nocera's "Artificial Leaf" invention :) Yours, Esa Ruoho http://www.lackluster.org/