Dear Friends..
The 5 demo-experiments made with the Rossi E-cats
were impressive, however far from perfect, the heat
generated and claimed can be overrated.The results are
vulnerable to some unverifiable hypotheses- hidden energy sources or
non-apparent energy losses/overratings (wet steam)
In
At 11:31 AM 5/31/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
... as long as Rossi uses his own designates to report measurements,
he will not be taken seriously. As soon as it would be visual and
obvious so anyone can see it, he would be rich and famous.
Cude has repeated this meme, it should be answered. Rossi
The Multiverse Interpretation of Quantum
MechanicsAuthors:
Raphael Bousso,
Leonard Susskind
http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3796
We argue that the many-worlds of quantum mechanics and the many worlds of
the multiverse are the same thing, and that the multiverse is necessary
to give exact
My apologies if this is already old news.
New May 31 article out on pesn.com
Cold Fusion #1 Claims NASA Chief
This is an interesting article. Well worth reading, IMHO.
Interview with Rossi. Also describes the silly politics that is
playing out in regards to whether the Rossi effect is really
I think is a sucker capture effect
2011/6/1 OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com
My apologies if this is already old news.
New May 31 article out on pesn.com
Cold Fusion #1 Claims NASA Chief
This is an interesting article. Well worth reading, IMHO.
Interview with
At 10:58 AM 6/1/2011, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
http://pesn.com/2011/05/31/9501837_Cold-Fusion_Number-1_Claims_NASA_Chief/
Hmmm ... seems to be bending over backwards not to have to call it
Fusion ... (all of them big-bucks HOT fusion money at stake by any chance?).
If you can
And Tesla was also broadcasting in Torsion-Waves. . . .
From: mi...@medleas.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 13:07:23 -0400
Subject: [Vo]:I'm bck!
Hello Guys,
In some computer juggling I got disconnected from Vortex but have now crawled
out of the woodwork to
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
If you can sneak a proton into Nickel by some non-classical-fusion means,
resulting in Copper, then it's not FUSION?
Naaa, that's transmutation. Let's see how the NASA folks like that term! ;-)
T
At 12:47 PM 6/1/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
If you can sneak a proton into Nickel by some non-classical-fusion means,
resulting in Copper, then it's not FUSION?
Naaa, that's transmutation. Let's see how the NASA folks like
What did you THINK multiverse meant?
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
The Multiverse Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Authors: Raphael Bousso, Leonard Susskind
http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3796
We argue that the many-worlds of quantum mechanics and the
I dont believe this.
Subject: Dr. Steven Jones Circuit Gives Evidence of 8x OVERUNITY!
Hello all,
On the PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGY HOUR, I talk about Dr. Steven Jones public
domain overunity circuit:
http://pesn.com/2011/05/27/9501835_Steven_E_Jones_demonstrates_overunity_cir
cuit/
At 01:12 PM 6/1/2011, Alexander Hollins wrote:
What did you THINK multiverse meant?
Generally, multiverse has been used to explain the
anthropic/goldilocks (not too hot, not too cold) effect (and the
10^billion possible universes in string theory).
But all the multiverses are assumed to have
Umm... I've seen the suggestion that each probability event creates
multiple possible worlds, based on outcomes, and splits into separate
'verses with each decision... I think the oldest reference to that
idea I've seen was from the 50's? Some of Asimov's essays on the
subject.
On Wed, Jun 1,
eCAT : Energy (from) Controlled AlchemisticTransmutation
Is it still based on the Joule Thief?
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:18 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
I dont believe this.
Subject: Dr. Steven Jones Circuit Gives Evidence of 8x OVERUNITY!
Hello all,
On the PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGY HOUR, I talk about Dr. Steven Jones public
domain
At 10:58 AM 6/1/2011, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
http://pesn.com/2011/05/31/9501837_Cold-Fusion_Number-1_Claims_NASA_Chief/
A partial transcript is at
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/06/01/nasas-bushnell-lenr-most-promising-energy-alternative-and-its-not-fusion/
Bushnell isn't
Alan:
According to Rossi, a reactor has been running for 2 YEARS in a warehouse in
Italy...
It's only the recent demos/tests that have run for 18 hours or less, and those
were shut down
intentionally.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alan J Fletcher [mailto:a...@well.com]
Sent:
In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:01:26 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
At 12:47 PM 6/1/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
If you can sneak a proton into Nickel by some non-classical-fusion means,
resulting in Copper,
Robin,
I agree And perhaps these yet to be discovered devices to travel thru time will
look like UFOs! Your temporal cycle would generate
Alternate time branches making it difficult to capture future technology
without altering the sequence of events in the future which would allow the
capture
this is just a test
Harry
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
this is just a test
You passed, with a C+.
T
Each of us already being all of single entire unified creative fractal
hyperinfinity, always shimmering along all possible corridors of
meaning, the putative present, the constantly evolving pasts, the
entire manifold of ever increasingly fabulous futures, with sideways
causality among all streams
In case you want detailed reasonable evidence for a cautious judgement
that massive excess heat from the Rossi reactor has not yet been shown
publicly:
fromRich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com
reply-tovortex-l@eskimo.com
to vortex-L@eskimo.com,
Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com,
Rich
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:54:46 -0400:
Hi Fran,
[snip]
Bertrand Russell stated it the most clearly: There are no paradoxes. That's
because paradoxes (including temporal paradoxes) are self annihilating. That
also means that there are no such things as time
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
Cude ... as long as Rossi uses his own designates to report measurements,
he will not be taken seriously. As soon as it would be visual and obvious so
anyone can see it, he would be rich and famous.
Lomax Cude has
It may be correct to invoke Feynman's sum of all possible histories
approach in quantum mechanics.
Thus, in many situations, a measurement that determines a specific
outcome, also selects out of many probable histories, a specific
history that starts at some prior specific measurement and leads
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
Cude But as long as Rossi uses his own designates to report measurements,
he will not be taken seriously. As soon as it would be visual and obvious so
anyone can see it, he would be rich and famous.
Lomax It is
Not being very competent or informed, I searched Google to find expert
critiques of Widom-Larsen theory:
1 of 126 pages of discussion re Rossi reactor -- started by
djolds1
Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 863
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 7:16 pmPost subject: 10KW LENR Demonstrator?
includes:
28 matches
Mail list logo
