I have been following the fine work of the MFMP team and analyzing the data.
These guys are doing excellent work and I congratulate them for sharing their
data on a real time basis for everyone to view. I wish that we had the same
cooperation from the other experimenters, but I understand why
Maybe they are creating fractals...:)
More precisely, the Mandelbrot set is the set of values of *c* in the complex
plane http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_plane for which the
orbithttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbit_(dynamics) of
0 under iteration
Stars may not be so fine-tuned after all
A change in nature's fundamental constants could still allow star formation.
Would stars light up the sky in other universes? It's often claimed
that the fundamental constants of physics in our own Universe are
exquisitely tuned to permit stars – and
Axil:
The figure of 1 you gave for permittivity, is relative permittivity.
The absolute figure is 8.854187817 × 10^−12 F/m (Farads/meter)
-mark
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 3:06 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Engineering varying LENR
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:29 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Does this suggest that the major heat transport mechanism is convection
into the air instead of radiation?
There is a clue in the Celani data from ICCF 17. Look at the variation
which has been attributed to the
Sorry if this confuses matters, but I recall Celani stating somewhere in
writing: believe me, this device is not a black-body radiator. It may
have been on that Italian site with 22 in the name. No time to hunt it
down just now ...
Jeff
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:29 AM, David Roberson
Best Seinfeld shtick mimicry :
So what's the deal with group 7 ? [puzzled looks in the audience, and no
laughter]
No, not the rockers, rappers or halogens, and not the G7 money-baggers ...
nothing to do with the New World Order ... cough, cough ... unless this
message is being channeled from
Andrea Rossi
November 15th, 2012 at 2:11 PM
Dear Mark Saker:
1- The prototype we are making, fueled by gas, will weight about 1 tonn (I
hope).
2- If we will be able to make 1 MW/tonn I will be very happy.
3- The prototype we are making will be (gas fueled) 2 meters long, 1 meter
wide, 1 meter
BTW, the Celani's wires are based on Isotan (Constantan trademark):
http://www.isabellenhuette.de/fileadmin/content/widerstandslegierungen/ISOTA
N-ISABELLENHUETTE-R.pdf?PHPSESSID=e5f77mrb8kiksmi0afimqcnub4
The Isotan contains 1% of Mn. Celani didn't say that Mn plays a magic role
in his wire.
Hello collective,
Is Thorium really safer? And is it reallya a feasible solution?
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21628905.600-indias-thoriumbased-nuclear-dream-inches-closer.html?cmpid=RSS|NSNS|2012-GLOBAL|online-news
Regards,
Patrick
I've looked at this a little. It's been under study for over 30 years, so
the pros and cons are pretty well understood. The wikipedia page (thorium
fuel cycle) covers them. It's definitely feasible, probably an economic
win for countries with a lot of thorium (e.g. India), and arguably a little
Thorium itself cannot be used directly. Natural thorium is mostly composed
of a single isotope, Th-232, that is only fertile, not fissile. Use of
thorium in a power reactor or weapon requires that the natural Th-232 be
transmuted within an already-operating reactor to U-233, which is fissile.
This
Thanks again Jeff. Will have a look at those references.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
Thorium itself cannot be used directly. Natural thorium is mostly composed
of a single isotope, Th-232, that is only fertile, not fissile. Use of
thorium in a power
13 matches
Mail list logo
