Re: [Vo]:IBM Stop Motion Film of Cu Atoms

It was well known that the surface atoms of metals e.g. in catalysts are very mobile, and this has scientific and technological importance- see e.g. my Surfdyn psper (Fusion Technology 24 AUG 1993, 122-6) re CF. Peter On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1

Re: [Vo]:Barron's (April 27, 2013) investigates Li-battery fires

I wrote: it is unlikely that you can have a hydroton in which, after successive > vibrations of the chain, the hydrogen nuclei gradually combine with the > electrons sandwiched between them and give off small bursts of low-energy > EMF. This seems to fly in the face of Coulomb repulsion and the l

Re: [Vo]:Simple phenomenon

Jones, You may want to visit the following URLs: A Magnetic Linear Accelerator http://puhep1.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/lin_accel.pdf (videos) http://www.accelerators.org.uk/MA/ -- Lou Pagnucco Jones Beene wrote: > Not easy to explain, but seems to violate conservation of momentum > > ht

Re: [Vo]:cavitation theory of matter

This is an interesting concept. Dave -Original Message- From: Harry Veeder To: vortex-l Sent: Thu, May 2, 2013 12:58 am Subject: [Vo]:cavitation theory of matter Nice video explaining a cavitation theory of matter where matter is a hole in the fabric of space. http://www.youtube.c

[Vo]:cavitation theory of matter

Nice video explaining a cavitation theory of matter where matter is a hole in the fabric of space. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeJhuZK-Bow Harry

Re: [Vo]:Simple phenomenon

Earlier I was proposing a thought experiment where I slowly added steel pellets to a fixed magnet. Work was done against my retarding force for each pellet until they completely covered and enclosed the field of the magnet. The conclusion was that when an external steel or iron object is place

Re: [Vo]:Barron's (April 27, 2013) investigates Li-battery fires

Hi Ed, In fact, I suggested an explanation that met all of these requirements, but > this was either rejected or ignored. Consequently, I have very little hope > for any theory being accepted any time soon. > I have read your recent JCMNS articles. My difficulty with your explanation is almost i

RE: [Vo]:Simple phenomenon

Earlier discussion here? . guess I missed it. Did anyone bring up "shock demagnetization"? It is not a well-known effect, but it could be part of what is going on here. An instant demagnetization in the first magnet is followed by a field collapse in the end magnet which adds to the mec

Re: [Vo]:Simple phenomenon

Energy is conserved, since you will need to pay it back in the form of work when you decide to pull the spheres apart afterwards. Eric On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:07 PM, David Roberson wrote: This demonstration follows an earlier discussion where we determined that > magnetic potential energy is

Re: [Vo]:Simple phenomenon

This demonstration follows an earlier discussion where we determined that magnetic potential energy is released as the first sphere comes into contact with the magnet attached to the second one. This additional energy is imparted upon the exiting sphere. I am confident that the conservation of

[Vo]:Simple phenomenon

Not easy to explain, but seems to violate conservation of momentum http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIsGfMrZHbg from an old BYU prof. who you may remember. <>

Re: [Vo]:Roberts Rotary Engine

I have added this video to the list of quirky free energy videos that I'm starting. >From the last segment of the video: "The complete theory can be found in a single book." ... "Particle Mechanics: The Theory of Energy States" http://particlemechanics.com/ http://particlemechanics.com/book_purch

Re: [Vo]:IBM Stop Motion Film of Cu Atoms

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Ron Wormus wrote: Pretty Cool. > > stop-motion-film-486198380?**autoplay=1 > > > That's entertaining. We will

[Vo]:Roberts Rotary Engine

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHxYqnev59g *Roberts Rotary Engine* The rotary Papp engine is a poor design…no, let me be more emphatic…an unworkable design because the feedback current cannot be produced or captured. The Papp engine must run in a two cylinder reciprocation cycle.

Re: [Vo]:IBM Stop Motion Film of Cu Atoms

It's blowing my mind to think how tiny this actually is. Anybody who thinks there is a difference between art and science doesn't know a damn thing about either. Sci-artists unite! On 5/1/13 11:42 AM, Ron Wormus wrote: Pretty Cool.

[Vo]:IBM Stop Motion Film of Cu Atoms

Pretty Cool.

Re: [Vo]:Barron's (April 27, 2013) investigates Li-battery fires

I hope that the semiconductor comparison is not the one that we are dealing with in the pursuit of LENR(+). That has been a torturous journey for many researchers over such a long period of time. One look at the very first transistor brings on a big laugh when you realize how limited its perfo

[Vo]:broken time symetry

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/04/time-crystals/

Re: [Vo]:Barron's (April 27, 2013) investigates Li-battery fires

On May 1, 2013, at 1:16 AM, David Roberson wrote: Ed, I agree completely with you that a theory must be able to make predictions that can be shown to be true and I am not aware that such a theory has arrived. You have an interesting one which does appears to answer many important questi

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: [New post] The Bedlam Within Protons and Neutrons

Science recognizes that screening can accelerated alpha decay. How does such screening affect the pions in their ability to keep these nucleons inside the atom? In detail, what does screening do to the pions? What changes? On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Joseph S. Barrera III wrote: > On 4/30/20

Re: [Vo]:Barron's (April 27, 2013) investigates Li-battery fires

I think this may have happened to DGT. On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:07 AM, wrote: > In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:03:59 -0600: > Hi, > [snip] > >But Robin, how do you tell what is real and what is embellished? > > You can't. You can only guess. > > >He > >detected Cu

Re: [Vo]:Barron's (April 27, 2013) investigates Li-battery fires

I will get interested in a theory when it can explain how any set of output elements can be produced from some other collection of input elements. Both the Rossi ash assay and the DGT ash assay show a high flexibility of transmutation products in this regard. As another example, the transmutation

Re: [Vo]:Barron's (April 27, 2013) investigates Li-battery fires

Ed, I agree completely with you that a theory must be able to make predictions that can be shown to be true and I am not aware that such a theory has arrived. You have an interesting one which does appears to answer many important questions. Have you been able to demonstrate a working system