Mill's present and future- as creator of a new energy source will be
decided at nd by the CIHT Technology.
see
http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/TechnicalPresentation.pdf
It seems that the essential action- scale up and
intensification is going more slowly than planne
http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/10/new-type-of-quantum-excitation-behaves-like-a-solitary-particle/
New type of quantum excitation behaves like a solitary particle, a real
particle.
They call it a "leviton", we know this fractional charged soliton as a
hydrino.
What does Mills do now?
Thx Fran!
RE: Ether never really left but nice to see it returning to center stage.
It never left in reality, but it most certainly did as far as mainstream
physics is, or was, concerned
RE: HUP
HUP is only a result of having to measure the weight of one of those angels
on the head
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Ruby wrote:
cold fusion, LENR, LANR, AHE, quantum fusion, and HENI.
>
Maybe CFLLAQFH?
Eric
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
A galaxy red-shifted to appear 30 billion years old is "really" much younger
> when you apply the funky logic of "inflation" Kinda sounds like voodoo
> economics to me.
>
Another variable in the abstract subject to creative bookeeping -- s
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
If they had something like a commercial prototype years ago, suitable for
> testing, why are they still working with this crude gadget?
>
I recall seeing a link to slides somewhere on this list with advice to
people giving demos -- something t
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:24:57 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>
>That would certainly explain the mystery. I have read some of the thoughts
>about the lack of interaction, but others studies suggest that they do. I
>recall some of the coding tricks that have been te
By the way, there is NOTHING wrong with a crude prototype device. See the
first transistor:
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/talk/transistor.gif
An early Diesel engine, probably better than the prototype that exploded:
http://image.dieselpowermag.com/f/features/0912dp_rudolph_diesel/25492076/0
Okay, this is "inside baseball," meaning it is only of interest only to
aficionados but . . .
Years ago the journal Nature claimed that Wikipedia is nearly as reliable
as Britannica. This article calls that finding into question:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/23/britannica_wikipedia_nature
Alain Sepeda wrote:
I agree that Elforsk and all evidence we have don't eliminate the risk that
> E-cat does not work well... that it is unstable, unreliable, or have
> problems...
>
Yes. On the contrary, the ELFORSK paper shows that it is unstable. It
melted!
The Hotcat version is clearly not
That would certainly explain the mystery. I have read some of the thoughts
about the lack of interaction, but others studies suggest that they do. I
recall some of the coding tricks that have been tested that prevent
interception of messages without detection of the tap. These techniques app
If you read M theory they believe gravity may "leak" from one dimension to
another as closed oscillating strings. This is why I believe our solar
brane is leaking energetic strings in our solar wind and we interpret them
as weather disturbances as they decay overhead and around us in jet streams
a
I would like to see how this measurement was performed. Does anyone else
recall the source?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Craig
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Oct 23, 2013 5:09 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How is the mainstream science misarable
On 10/23/2013 05:04 PM, David Roberson wrote:
>
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:04:58 -0400 (EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>As I have mentioned before, the speed at which entangled particles interact
>appears to be infinite and not limited by electromagnetic rules.
>
>If entangled particles have no speed limit, why should gravit
On 10/23/2013 05:04 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Is there any evidence that gravitational waves travel at the speed of
> light? As far as I know, that velocity is merely assumed by
> Einstein. This may not be true since there are no measurements of the
> components of gravity such as magnetic and
Is there any evidence that gravitational waves travel at the speed of light?
As far as I know, that velocity is merely assumed by Einstein. This may not be
true since there are no measurements of the components of gravity such as
magnetic and electric fields which define the speed of electrom
I agree that Elforsk and all evidence we have don't eliminate the risk that
E-cat does not work well... that it is unstable, unreliable, or have
problems...
what this article rules out is that e-cat does not exist, is not working at
all, is a fraud...
of course some will try to stick on their pos
Greetings, For a second year, I have made a calendar that showcases the
incredible achievements in the field of cold fusion, LENR, LANR, AHE,
quantum fusion, and HENI.
This year's "theme" is schools and colleges with faculty who have
pursued experimental research, and gotten students involved.
I found the "cosmic" strings and gravity waves last year, they are looking
in the wrong place :)...
http://darkmattersalot.com/2013/07/21/just-for-the-hell-of-it-now-that-i-have-your-attention-i-am-going-to-repeat-myself/
Stewart
Darkmattersalot.com
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Hamdi Ucar
"How Did Supermassive Black Holes Grow So Big?"
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131023090952.htm
Gravitational waves are never found, even there is no encouraging clue.
GW possibly does not exist becuase c is not a limit.
It is a comedy to give the 'upper limit' argument of non e
I agree Jones. It will not surprise me to find that much that is thought to be
true about science will be overturned with time. LENR acceptance by the
physics establishment will become a perfect example.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Oct 23, 201
How to spin what would otherwise be a major embarrassment
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v502/n7472/full/nature12657.html
A galaxy red-shifted to appear 30 billion years old is "really" much younger
when you apply the funky logic of "inflation" Kinda sounds like voodoo
economics to
Blaze Spinnaker wrote:
Impressive. Looks like Elforsk has decided that the May report has some
> merit.
>
As noted they already said that in the previous press release: "The
measurements show that the catalyst gives substantially more energy than
can be explained by ordinary chemical reactions
It is a finding from david...he posted it on the forum.
probably from the mouth of the horse... ;-)
2013/10/23 Jed Rothwell
> Alain:
>
> Thanks for posting this. Do you know where the original Swedish document
> is?
>
> - Jed
>
>
Mark,
Nicely said! Ether never really left but nice to see it returning to center
stage. Changes in this ether / vacuum density due to nano geometry can
however polarize - segregate larger pockets of altered vacuum pressure
encompassing entire atoms and molecules and when these atoms or molecules
Impressive. Looks like Elforsk has decided that the May report has some
merit.
This is definitely an event which increases the probability of what Rossi
is doing will work.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Sunil Shah wrote:
> An overview is to be expected. The final paragraph says:
>
> "The
An overview is to be expected. The final paragraph says:
"There are an estimated 20 something players, who in one way or another are
active or doing research in the cold fusion domain. On behalf of Elforsk, an
overview of the current stance in research, findings, etc., is being compiled.
The
27 matches
Mail list logo
