http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/jul/19/radioactive-decay-accounts-for-half-of-earths-heat
Radioactive decay accounts for half of Earth's heat
"One thing we can say with near certainty is that radioactive decay alone
is not enough to account for Earth's heat energy," says KamLAND
col
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Alain Sepeda
wrote:
Someone in france, Gaspard Koenig support an interesting view on liberalism.
> the system should support autonomy, meaning that people should be secure
> enough to dare to behave autonomously and not to depend on anybody.
>
I like this line of
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
Here is Bill O'Reilly's rebuttal, which I haven't fully read, but include
> for anyone who is interested:
>
Sorry! That's Tim O'Reilly, not Bill O'Reilly.
Eric
Chris I agree with you about the equality under law. It is a joke. OJ
Simpson etc.
The poll you showed I am less impressed with. Too many of the questions are
based on the government and how it is done. That type of question will
probably make people vote along party lines.
It does not say how many
Here is a piece by Paul Graham, beloved of the startup crowd for his
involvement in Y Combinator:
http://www.paulgraham.com/ineq.html
In this piece, Graham advances the depressing thesis that the post-WWII
period of middle-class prosperity was a historical moment, and that what we
are seeing now
Chris Zell wrote:
Attitudes of the rich?
>
>
>
>
> https://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/29/1302820/-Someone-finally-polled-the-1-And-it-s-not-pretty?detail=emailclassic
>
>
>
> There you go. Yes, they have a tendency to be SOB’s.
>
Ugh. Well . . . On the other hand, 13% of them say it is "the
Attitudes of the rich?
https://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/29/1302820/-Someone-finally-polled-the-1-And-it-s-not-pretty?detail=emailclassic
There you go. Yes, they have a tendency to be SOB's.
2016-02-19 18:00 GMT+01:00 H LV :
> However, basic
> income
> should be high enough so that paid work does not need to be incentivized
> by money. Paid work
>
Someone in france, Gaspard Koenig support an interesting view on liberalism.
the system should support autonomy, meaning that people sh
H LV wrote:
> A similar judgement can be made about slavery: it is bad for the economy
> because it is inefficient.
>
Yes. That was true even in the 19th century, which is one the reasons the
U.S. north was wealthier than the south. Coerced labor is inherently
inefficient.
Nowadays, even enthu
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/02/feb-19-2016-toward-new-discipline-of.html
The results of the 350 days Test- a 30 days mystery?
Positive or negative but NOT imaginary
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Alain Sepeda
wrote:
>
>
> the good way to judge policy is not through morality, but through
> incentive network.
>
>
>>
A similar judgement can be made about slavery: it is bad for the economy
because it is inefficient.
The argument sounds good, but slave owners a
The books are soft. The apps are soft. The board will have a value added
software injection. We are making nothing at all, just vaporware; but there
they are products. Welcome to a strange new land..
-Original Message-
From: Frank Znidarsic
To: vortex-l ; rvargo1062
Sent: Fri, Fe
Again I am using new technology to take products to market. I could never do
this with 1990 technology. I am working with a friend Ron A. on the next
generation of Monitoring. A board will blue tooth into a tablet. The tablet
will send alarm messages upon a contact closure on the board. We
I know this is a bit off topics but we have drifted off into utopian (or
dystopian?) scenarios. In the US, there is a severe problem with the lack of
equality under law.
Whether it's a lack of public defenders or Federal agencies that thuggishly
pursue small companies instead of big ones, the p
Alain Sepeda wrote:
if you have an income that is not removed if you work and get paid,
> whatever it is, then you have no incentive not to work, and much incentive
> to work, even for cheap, but never if it is not productive.
>
That is true, and important. Many wealthy people work hard even tho
to explain more simply the interest of UNCONDITIONAL basic income.
if you have an income that is not removed if you work and get paid,
whatever it is, then you have no incentive not to work, and much incentive
to work, even for cheap, but never if it is not productive.
In this way basic income, un
16 matches
Mail list logo
