Craig and Alain--
Mutagenic changes in gene cells are not always corrected in the egg cells of
females nor in the sperm cell of males. However damaged egg cells are more
likely because they stay vital for many years, sometimes a much as 60 years in
humans. If an egg cell incurs a mutagenic c
a.ashfield wrote:
> I have experience of ~90 glass melting furnaces ranging from 4 - 450 T/day.
> The electrically heated ones were quite cool because the superstructure is
> not hot. The gas fired ones use ~4 million BTU per ton so a 250 t/day
> melter would use the equivalent of 12208 KW. T
Jed,
I have experience of ~90 glass melting furnaces ranging from 4 - 450
T/day.The electrically heated ones were quite cool because the
superstructure is not hot.The gas fired ones use ~4 million BTU per ton
so a 250 t/day melter would use the equivalent of 12208 KW.The glass is
heated to ~1
Jed,
They may have been 20KW. I found a link that indicates that he did
indeed switch from the smaller e-cats to the 250KW units. The URL is
"http://hydrofusion.com/news/e-cat-third-quarter-developments-2015";
The main quote is:
"Built-in Redundancy
In the first week of August, 2015, Ross
Hi Jed,
I understood that he did indeed have 4 250 kW units in the container which he
used for the test. The older 50 or so smaller units were also in the container
as back up units but were never used in 1 year test, only the 250 W units were
used apparently.
There are pictures I think on hi
Robert Dorr wrote:
> Didn't Rossi switch from the small square 10kw boxes you refer to, to 4
> 250kw units.
I think there are 50 boxes in the latest unit, so that's 20 kW per box =
1,000 kW.
- Jed
Jed,
Didn't Rossi switch from the small square 10kw boxes you refer to, to
4 250kw units.
Robert Dorr
WA7ZQR
At 01:17 PM 5/15/2016, you wrote:
Okay, here are the specs for these boilers:
file:///home/chronos/u-1160197d37ec1500e70f021620dd3bae3f09f41c/Downloads/DR_Electric%20Steam%20Boiler
Okay, here are the specs for these boilers:
file:///home/chronos/u-1160197d37ec1500e70f021620dd3bae3f09f41c/Downloads/DR_Electric%20Steam%20Boiler_Nov10.pdf
The models S242 and CR242 are both 420 kW.
The dimensions for both are listed in inches: 43" L x 58" W x 78" H
That's 1 m x 1.5 m x 2 m
I
Thanks Eric.
From the specs I got the impression it was about 1 sq m (30x30x60 inches) but
perhaps it was a component as it looks bigger in your picture. Still should fit
in a container though. More interesting to me was the data about efficiency.
I wish there was an HVAC engineer who has work
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
http://www.cleaverbrooks.com/Products-and-Solutions/Boilers/Electric/Model-IWH/Index.aspx
>
> Would this not be equivalent to a 250 kW ecat unit?
>
The max is 350 kW. Here is an image with a person to show the scale:
http://www.cleaverbroo
Hello Jed,
I'm clearly no expert and do not claim to be but there are interesting examples
of electrical boilers on the Internet.
Here is an interesting link to a electrical water heater that seems comparable
to an e-cat unit.
http://www.cleaverbrooks.com/Products-and-Solutions/Boilers/Electr
If you read everything you will see why is it a Sunday issue
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-15-2016-sunday-issue-about-lenr.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Robert Dorr wrote:
> I just don't see why it is so difficult determining the COP of such a
> large system. As far as I can see you have to make a few measurements to
> get a very good idea of a thermal plants performance. . . .
>
It is not difficult when you stick to the ASME codes for instrume
Axil Axil wrote:
It seems to me that calorimetry is a weak subject to base a defence on.
> Nether the judge or any of the jury will have even heard the word let alone
> understand why the ERV messed it up. The layers for the defence will need a
> expert witness to educate the court on what is goo
Peter Gluck wrote:
you do not get the significance of the electricity bills for the
> Rossi-IH trial?
>
I have not seen any electricity bills, and I know nothing about them.
You have not seen them but they exist.
>
Have you seen them? What do they show? What are you talking about?
> By the
I just don't see why it is so difficult
determining the COP of such a large system. As
far as I can see you have to make a few
measurements to get a very good idea of a thermal
plants performance. 1) temperature of water going
in, 2) temperature or water going out, 3) water
flow rate, 4)
Robert Dorr wrote:
> Since you are in communication with someone that is linked to I.H. maybe
> you can answer a few questions.
>
Sorry, I cannot address these questions. I hope that I.H. will be able to
address them.
- Jed
Hi Jed
Thanks again for your patience with my questions. I know they were a bit basic
but I wanted to clarify exactly the understanding.
Most the thermal issues especially the waste heat are honestly over my head so
I will leave that to experts.
If there is less than 20kW thermal output I sup
Axil--
Don’t be so mean!
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 9:00 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat
But there is a contradiction here since IH accepted that the Rossi reactor does
produce gainful heat to the tune of $11,500,000.
Eric--
Thanks for that correction. I was reading the original agreement. I assume
the difference between 4 and 6 was only a matter of fine tuning for Rossi.
The agreement indicated the requirement to identify the control procedures to
operate the E-Cat. What those procedures specify will b
you do not get the significance of the electricity bills for the
Rossi-IH trial?
You have not seen them but they exist.
By the way I have read three discussion threads and 40 comments
but could not ffind your explanation about why the IH technicians are
convinced that there was absolutely NO exce
Axil--
See the Civil complaint that Rossi filed in the Federal Court:
Case 1:16-cv-21199-CMA Document 1, Entered on FLSD Document 04/05/2016 Page 1.
I specifies: “CIVIL COMPLAINT & DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL”
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 2:50 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re:
Peter Gluck wrote:
But it cannot waste the heat that is not produced.- as you believe; or not?
>
Perhaps you misunderstand the term "waste" in this context.
The term "waste heat" means heat that is not transferred to the fluid in a
boiler. It means heat that radiates from boiler to the surround
Stephen Cooke wrote:
This is probably a naive question on my part, so I apologize for that. But
> in the interest of clarity I wonder if the definition of "excess heat" and
> "heat balance" is the same for all parties. I strongly expect it is of
> course.
>
As far as I know it is! I have not hea
But it cannot waste the heat that is not produced.- as you believe; or not?
If the efficiency was indeed so low, who has paid the huge electricity bill?
It could be as high as 85 million kWh- how much does this cost in Florida?
peter
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I menti
I mentioned that an HVAC engineer estimated that the Rossi device heat
transfer efficiency is probably low. This is called the AFUE (annual fuel
utilization efficiency). Typical AFUE are:
56 to 70% for old furnaces
80 to 83% for mid-range efficiency
90 to 99% for advanced, high efficiency heaters
Hi Jed,
This is probably a naive question on my part, so I apologize for that. But in
the interest of clarity I wonder if the definition of "excess heat" and "heat
balance" is the same for all parties. I strongly expect it is of course.
It seems from what you said that the technicians measured
27 matches
Mail list logo