[Vo]:The Defence uses for LENR

Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) allowed the publication of a report by Mosier-Boss, P.A., L. Forsley, and P. McDaniel "Investigation of Nano Nuclear Reactions in Condensed Matter, Final Report. 2016," *http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MosierBossinvestigat.pdf

Re: [Vo]:History of cold fusion in Italy. Retrograde performance: maybe the Coyote rules?

On 09/03/2016 01:35 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Stephen A. Lawrence > wrote: And more important, how could the dirt /circulate?/ It wouldn't make it past the boil/vaporize/recondense stage. If there really was steam, the dirt could be coming

[Vo]:do not deny, do not try to kill a valid, well working LENR technology

this message must be repeated because it interfers with the task of some people - http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/sep-03-2016-do-not-deny-do-not-try-to.html- peter Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:History of cold fusion in Italy. Retrograde performance: maybe the Coyote rules?

Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > And more important, how could the dirt *circulate?* It wouldn't make it > past the boil/vaporize/recondense stage. > If there really was steam, the dirt could be coming from the condenser. > As if we needed more proof -- but the brown water

Re: [Vo]:Recommended eBook about Mills

Jones. As someone who still thinks there is a future for Ni/LAH/Li and that it has in fact been replicated, I am not so keen on Mills' solution. It looks to me that there are serious engineering problems with the combination of very high temperature, electrode wear and moving parts. Even if

Re: [Vo]:History of cold fusion in Italy. Retrograde performance: maybe the Coyote rules?

Hey, speaking of dirty water, there was a really worthwhile observation on that thread: "Could be anything. Rust, dirt, bacteria. If Rossi wouldn't just let it circulate with a mild 20 kW heating once per circle, *it'd all clog up in whatever part is supposed to turn that filth into steam.*"

[Vo]:Recommended eBook about Mills

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01LDVWJ0I/ https://www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/randell-mills-and-the-search/9990 052142999-item.html http://www.brettholverstott.com/author/ I bought the Kindle version but have not finished it yet, and am pleasantly surprised (but at the same time

Re: [Vo]:History of cold fusion in Italy. Retrograde performance: maybe the Coyote rules?

Jed, You said the pipe was DN40. There is no way one would put a DN80 flowmeter on a pipe that small. I assume it was mounted on a DM80 pipe and that was why it was as large as it was. I depended on memory because I didn't want to take the time to look it up. Without the piping drawing it

Re: [Vo]:History of cold fusion in Italy. Retrograde performance: maybe the Coyote rules?

Jed, I wanted specifically information about people to whom (as you say) IH has complained in 2015 about the 1MW plant. What has Rossi do with this. The strange thing is that NOBODY has confirmed what you say, e.g. on forums where LENRists write. You use the oppressors logic "I say you must

Re: [Vo]:History of cold fusion in Italy. Retrograde performance: maybe the Coyote rules?

As the water is continuously distilled I see no reason why it should be "seriously dirty." AA On 9/2/2016 11:56 PM, Eric Walker wrote: On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence > wrote: And obvious point ... if the water in the

Re: [Vo]:History of cold fusion in Italy. Retrograde performance: maybe the Coyote rules?

a.ashfield wrote: >From memory the flowmeter was DN80, but that was just hearsay. > Why do you depend on memory? It is right there in Exhibit 5. The flowmeter was an Apator PoWoGaz, model number MWN130-80-NC. That is not "hearsay." It is a statement filed with the court