Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument

That is certainly one way of avoiding answering the questions I asked. You say you have "all the data." It seems very unlikely that IH has all Rossi's data and so how would you get it? AA On 2/17/2017 6:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield

Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument

a.ashfield wrote: I have every reason to doubt it. Saying that you have the piping drawing > but refuse to publish it doesn't hold water. > Okay, so you are saying I am a liar. Got it. I will block any further messages from you. Done and done. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument

Jed, I have every reason to doubt it. Saying that you have the piping drawing but refuse to publish it doesn't hold water. If it was indeed so damaging to Rossi IH would have published it already. As far as I can tell IH haven't even claimed the 1 MW didn't work, only that they could not

Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument

a.ashfield wrote: > If indeed you have all the data (which I doubt) . . . > You have no reason to doubt it. You are accusing me of lying here. I don't take kindly to that. > please post the much requested layout of the piping. > I will not post it. I have told you

Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument

Peter Gluck wrote: > you have no idea what other people think. > This has nothing to do with what people think. This is about plumbing. > The pipe you are showing there has nothing to do with the plant. > It is a gravity return pipe with a flow far smaller than its

Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument

Jed, If indeed you have all the data (which I doubt) please post the much requested layout of the piping. AA On 2/17/2017 2:10 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield > wrote: I rather liked Rossi's comment. Discussing the flowmeter on

[Vo]:professional approach to LENR, but how?

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-17-2017-proffessional-approach-to.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument

Jed, you have no idea what other people think. The pipe you are showing there has nothing to do with the plant. I was working with pipes in plants when you were stll in the kindergarten, you say too many inept things loud. I remember when you told the first time - getting no other explnation for

Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument

a.ashfield wrote: > I rather liked Rossi's comment. Discussing the flowmeter on the blogs > before the full information is released in court is about as useful as > discussing the sex of angels. > That is bullshit. We have Rossi's data. We have detailed information on

Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument

Jed, I rather liked Rossi's comment. Discussing the flowmeter on the blogs before the full information is released in court is about as useful as discussing the sex of angels. AA On 2/17/2017 11:12 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Peter Gluck >

Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument

Peter Gluck wrote: Jed. have claimed that a good flowmeter expert can convince the instrument > to show one order of magnitude more flow than the real one. (now this is 4X) Yes, you can make the error 4 X, or 10 X. At Defkalion the flow was zero and they showed it was

RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE

So the restoring force may be a quantum mechanical process that works under subtle conditions. Um. I am forced to wonder if this explanation is similar to skeptic Victor Stenger's rejection of quantum entanglement - when he suggested "de-coherence" as the alternative. An elegant

Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly positioning an instrument

An excellent paper kind of old friend- I remember when it was first discussed on the blog of my friend Daniele Passerini years before the trial and then once again in the Flowmeter scandal days when you, Jed. have claimed that a good flowmeter expert can convince the instrument to show one order