Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Lennart Thornros wrote: > I agree with Bob. > It has been a lot of name calling here on Vortex during the last year. > Especially AR has been given very demeaing epithets. > I still don't know how well his invention works. I know he is a

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

Hi Bob, My understanding of the details around that email about the positive test is vague. In your quote from Mats Lewans, he is is quoting Rossi, whose testimony I do not at all take at face value or assume to be accurate. What I do know is that at one point early on IH thought they had

RE: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

I would agree that the court documents were significant. I particularly thought that Darden’s email to Rossi regarding the successful production of fuel and reactor performance using the super confidential fuel mixture , known by only 4 individuals, was deterministic. >From Mats’ recent

RE: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

The firm Rossi selected typically does work on a contingent basis. So they don’t collect fees unless they win. Typically the contract calls for the payment of expenses. That wouldn’t prevent them from seeking fees from the other side but if there was no recovery, Rossi may not have paid

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

Eric: Thank you for sending that PM to Kirk. Like I said over there, maybe I'm wrong about you after all. Try to "suffer" through that compliment, ok? On 7/27/17, Eric Walker wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley > wrote: > > You

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: You engage in mind reading, you assign a > motive that I make it personal when anyone can review the comments on > that thread and see that it is not personal. >

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

Both sides submitted bills to the Court of about $7.5 million each ***I find that surprising, Jones. I expected IH's legal bills to be at least double that of Rossi's. I wonder how they got their top notch firm so cheap? What does this mean: This similarity of bills looks like collusion on

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

You're one to talk, Eric. You are among the most unreasonable moderators over at LENR-Forum with your acknowledged "Yes some farm animals are more equal than others" and other bullshit you throw on top of Pro-LENR enthusiasts and all the outright insults you allow by the skeptopath crowd. You

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

You mean 7 million of attorney's fees or 4+11-attorney's fees? 2017-07-27 10:37 GMT-03:00 Jones Beene : > 1) Rossi has a net of about $4 million ($11 million minus attorneys fees)

RE: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

Jones, yes lawyers are big winners as in all lawsuits. Agree that Rossi got what he wanted and paid for it. If it is junk it remins to be seen. IMHO he could retire on 4 mil also. Dumb Swedes, maybe future will tell. How you KNOW is mindboggling to me. He is an entrpreneur, a risktaker and he does

Re: [Vo]:Wind energy vs NxtGen Fission

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:21:03 -0700: Hi, [snip] >On average, wind requires about 200 times as much steel and concrete >structural material as a natural gas turbine plant of the same capacity. >Factoid: a two-megawatt (faceplate) wind turbine weighs about 250

RE: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

Living in fantasy land is like living in the desert with head in the sand IMHO---not unlike the land where religious dogma is prevails. My wondering did not take long to be resolved. Bob Cook From: Jones Beene Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:38 AM To:

RE: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

Adrian and Lennart— I wonder who after Che will be the first to defend their former anti-Rossi “claque”? Bob Cook From: Adrian Ashfield Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 5:28 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won' I

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

Anyone who thinks Rossi "won" is living in fantasy land. The only big winners were the attorneys for both sides. Both sides submitted bills to the Court of about $7.5 million each, hoping the judge would assess those costs to the other side. This similarity of bills looks like collusion on

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

I agree Lennart. Vortex is not the worst offender. lenrforum.com is worse. People there write hundreds of pages of insulting, unproven waffle/speculation. Apart from Jed most are anonymous armchair critics who do nothing themselves but apparently can't stand the thought of someone actually

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

Hi Bob, I'll propose another reason for the recent silence: disappointment at an extractive settlement and a realization that it is a mostly futile excercise to continue to debate with what remain of the hard core of Rossi's followers who haven't yet decamped after becoming familiar with the

RE: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

I agree with Bob. It has been a lot of name calling here on Vortex during the last year. Especially AR has been given very demeaing epithets. I still don't know how well his invention works. I know he is a true entrepreneur. He believes in his ideas. One overwhelming proof is that he settled for