Axil—
Franks presentation remind me of the Kim presentation regarding wimpzillas at
10e-24 to 10e-27 eV.
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 11:58:57 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:dark matter update
https://www.nature.com/news/dark-matt
Hydrinos will interact with bright matter magnetically and therefore is not
dark matter which does not interact with matter in any way save
gravitationally.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 6:45 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com <
bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The spectra of hydrinoes match that spectra o
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:42:50 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
> wrote:
>
>
>> >As I
>> >said, that total is always more than the energy added to the plasma, up to
>> >the iron limit.
>> [snip]
>> Actually, iron is not the limit. It depends on which nuclei you are trying
>> to
>
The spectra of hydrinoes match that spectra of cosmic radiation coming from the
Milky Way and elsewhere per Mills. See the following:
http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/EUV-Mechanism-051817.pdf
In addition kIM’s presentation identifying the prediction of WIPMZILLAS at
10
wrote:
> >As I
> >said, that total is always more than the energy added to the plasma, up to
> >the iron limit.
> [snip]
> Actually, iron is not the limit. It depends on which nuclei you are trying
> to
> fuse. A lone proton has zero net binding energy, so would fuse with any
> element
> in the
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:09:40 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>As I
>said, that total is always more than the energy added to the plasma, up to
>the iron limit.
[snip]
Actually, iron is not the limit. It depends on which nuclei you are trying to
fuse. A lone proton has zero ne
I meant to say:
> That is one way to define net energy. I would define it as the energy
> added to the plasma itself. By that definition, all fusion reactions with
> atoms lighter than iron always produce net energy.
>
I mean to say:
I would define it as the output energy from the plasma, which
JonesBeene wrote:
Krivit nailed ITER with charges of perpetrating active fraud to the public.
> In the face of the facts they have made a few changes (not enough) which is
> an embarrassment to the vocal supporters of this fraud - who immediately
> tried to slime Krivit.
>
Is there any indicatio
Krivit nailed ITER with charges of perpetrating active fraud to the public. In
the face of the facts they have made a few changes (not enough) which is an
embarrassment to the vocal supporters of this fraud - who immediately tried to
slime Krivit.
http://news.newenergytimes.net/2017/11/07/iter-
9 matches
Mail list logo
