In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 28 Jan 2018 13:26:56 -0700:
Hi Eric,
[snip]
>On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 1:08 PM, wrote:
>
>.. go right ahead. :)
>>
>
>It will take a while. :) But in the meantime I'll replace the rowboat
>analogy with a more apt one. One description of gravitational att
Jones—
For a nice qualitative summary of Mill’s theory see the following link:
http://www.brettholverstott.com/annoucements/2017/8/5/summary-of-randell-millss-unified-theory
Superconductivity of planar molecules (with electrons in a 2-D system ) are
discussed in item 12 of the summary.
Bob Coo
the neutron star pressure limit (1.5 to 3.0 solar masses),.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolman%E2%80%93Oppenheimer%E2%
80%93Volkoff_limit
should read
the neutron star pressure limit (1.33 solar masses)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrasekhar_limit
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Axil Ax
A post from can
>From the Tern Research website linked above by Ahlfors there's a press
release dated 2017-12-26; it has some interesting tidbits. It looks like
they're doing laser ablation experiments. Metals exposed to ultra-dense
hydrogen would take significantly more time to ablate.
* * * * *
Speaking of loss of “gravitational mass” the electrons in graphene are called
massless.
One of the most controversial and defining properties is indeed an “apparent
loss of mass” which aside from semantics, is interesting for a number of
practical reasons in batteries and capacitors.
https:/
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 1:08 PM, wrote:
.. go right ahead. :)
>
It will take a while. :) But in the meantime I'll replace the rowboat
analogy with a more apt one. One description of gravitational attraction
is that of a mutual attraction between two bodies with mass. It is similar
in that re
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 28 Jan 2018 12:39:48 -0700:
Hi Eric,
[snip]
>On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:32 PM, wrote:
>
>...which would make sense if light simply followed the curvature of space.
>>
>
>The curvature of spacetime is perhaps an abstraction that gets in the way
>of underst
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:32 PM, wrote:
...which would make sense if light simply followed the curvature of space.
>
The curvature of spacetime is perhaps an abstraction that gets in the way
of understanding in this instance. It is equivalent to the gravitational
influence of two or more bodie
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 28 Jan 2018 11:26:56 -0700:
Hi,
>On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:58 PM, wrote:
>
>Below: The conversion of matter into energy causes spacetime, and thus the
>> universe, to expand, since light has inertial but no gravitational mass.
>
>
>Note that this sets up
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:58 PM, wrote:
Below: The conversion of matter into energy causes spacetime, and thus the
> universe, to expand, since light has inertial but no gravitational mass.
Note that this sets up the weird situation of photons being influenced by
gravity (e.g., gravitational le
10 matches
Mail list logo
