https://thewire.in/the-sciences/iisc-room-temperature-superconductor-gold-silver-magnetic-susceptibility
In my view, there are two independent processes at play in the LENR
reaction such as happens in the Mizumo mesh: transmutation and vacuum
energy extraction. This leads to confusion about what nuclear reactions are
producing energy because we don't see any energy produced by transmutation
but we do
If mass energy conversion is treated as a cause of nuclear structure then
you are correct. I am looking at it as an effect of nuclear structure so
the energy produced per atom would only tell us that nuclear forces are
involved.
Harry
On Tue., Jul. 16, 2019, 6:23 p.m. , wrote:
> In reply to H
One of the formats that energy production in the LENR reaction can assume
is shock wave generation. The Papp engine produced a huge amount of energy
inside the combustion chambers of its paired cylinders but no heat. The
first Papp engine was based on the production of a fuel cycle based on
water.
In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:44:27 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>IMO the focus on mass-energy equivalence at the present time is not helpful
>in this field. It should be set aside until there is a rough explanation of
>the nuclear dynamics without it. Harry
[snip]
Calculation of the ener
Bob,
also if the force on the spring is removed then the extra mass will be
re-converted back into energy in addition to the transformation of
potential energy into the kinetic energy of the spring's motion as it
returns to equilibrium. However, the reconversion of the extra mass back
into energy
Harry—
Good questions.
I would say pulling on the spring adds potential energy to the spring and the
entity creating the tension. The entiity may be a closed system which entails
the weak “gracity” EM field forces as Jurg suggests.
Bob Cook
From: H LV
Sent: T
There is a natural tendency in the formulation of LENR theory to ignore or
flat out deny the existence of outlying or contraindicated LENR processes
that are generally observed and proven by observation but conflict with
preconceived notions of LENR reality.
One of these observations is that
On Tue., Jul. 16, 2019, 1:12 p.m. Jürg Wyttenbach,
wrote:
> My model shows that all mass is EM mass and in fact gravitation is the
> weakest EM force.
>
> EM mass behaves exactly as Einstein and others before Einstein already
> found. A spring under tension has more mass than a relaxed spring etc
My model shows that all mass is EM mass and in fact gravitation is the
weakest EM force.
EM mass behaves exactly as Einstein and others before Einstein already
found. A spring under tension has more mass than a relaxed spring etc.,
chemical reactions produce heat --> reduces mass.
The only cos
On Tue., Jul. 16, 2019, 9:54 a.m. JonesBeene, wrote:
>
>
> *From: *H LV
>
>
>
>- How much of the energy in a nuclear reaction is actually due to mass
>change?
>
>
>
> Is there any reason to think that it would not be all?
>
>
>
> Even if sequential hydrogen cluster formation is responsib
On Tue., Jul. 16, 2019, 9:51 a.m. Jed Rothwell,
wrote:
> H LV wrote:
>
> How much of the energy in a nuclear reaction is actually due to mass
>> change? A chemical reaction is accompanied by mass change but the change
>> is so small that it can be ignored so that essentially all the energy is
>
Energy is still the ability to do work. That hasn't changed, although some
new concepts and math has been introduced. Harry
On Tue., Jul. 16, 2019, 11:56 a.m. bobcook39...@hotmail.com, <
bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I consider it likely possible to measure mass loss or gain in small
> syste
I consider it likely possible to measure mass loss or gain in small
systems—nano or micro scale in size—where temperatures change and entropy
increases or decreases. However, Jurg”s theory regarding the parameter of
mass may indicate a different ratio between mass and energy, depending upon
From: H LV
➢ How much of the energy in a nuclear reaction is actually due to mass change?
Is there any reason to think that it would not be all?
Even if sequential hydrogen cluster formation is responsible for the gain, and
there is no fusion at all - the ultimate source of that heat would s
H LV wrote:
How much of the energy in a nuclear reaction is actually due to mass
> change? A chemical reaction is accompanied by mass change but the change
> is so small that it can be ignored so that essentially all the energy is
> due to EM forces performing work.
>
All forms of energy conver
How much of the energy in a nuclear reaction is actually due to mass
change? A chemical reaction is accompanied by mass change but the change
is so small that it can be ignored so that essentially all the energy is
due to EM forces performing work. Even if there were no mass change in a
nuclear re
Am 16.07.19 um 09:27 schrieb Axil Axil:
Living things can transmute elements. This ability is very hard to
understand in terms of theory.
May be you should start to learn a better theory... SM is fringe science
in regard to nuclear physics.
LENR is no mystery as there usually is no radiati
Regarding:
- I assume there is one fundamental cause of cold fusion in all systems.
It is the same thing in all cases. This is similar to saying that fission
is the same in reactors and bombs, although it looks and acts quite
different.
Living things can transmute elements. This abil
19 matches
Mail list logo
