On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote
A suspicious observer might say Rossi reduced his promised COP to 6 from 30 to
give him an excuse for requiring an input; for why he can't close the loop.
His problem isn't GETTING the COP -- it's CONTROLLING it. It
•
Andrea Rossi
May 30th, 2011 at 9:15 AM
ART: Talking of ART, there are two metropolitan legends which are walking
around: 1- We do not know the theory behind the operation of our apparatus:
false, I know the theory , and will release it after the international patent
will be
- Original Message -
On 2011-05-30 20:51, Alan Fletcher wrote:
2- again, no more public tests will be made
Somebody please tell Rossi in his blog (as I've been banned from
writing there, I can't) that with public tests people actually mean public
results/measurements
I've left that in my paper as a reliable link ... but it's not clear how to
join/ get editor rights.
(I saw several things that needed clarification/correction).
The linked blog also has competent (but skeptical) analysis .. in German, of
course. (Using which I can get to the train station,
This question was deleted. No answer.
Thon Brocket
May 20th, 2011 at 12:55 AM
Just for a little fun, Dr Rossi, would it be possible to cook something – boil
an egg or cook some pasta, perhaps – and video it? That would be a nice little
historical moment: “The first ever food cooked using
http://aleklett.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/the-sun-rossi%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Denergy-catalyzer%E2%80%9D-and-the-%E2%80%9Cneutron-barometer%E2%80%9D/#comments
The sun, Rossi’s ”energy catalyzer” and the “neutron barometer”
One hundred years ago the sun’s source of energy was a complete
An alternative translation of Rossispeak
http://www.talk-polywell.org/bb/viewtopic.php?t=2829postdays=0postorder=ascstart=1560sid=1bcf396d7381efeaaafd9b9d81c8e298
raphael : Here's what Rossi was attempting to say:
To assert that we are enriching Ni powders in the conventional manner would be
Original :
http://www.energikatalysatorn.se/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2t=57sid=8b0cab3864cf96c68a71692b63658e2c
GT:
Ekstrom: Crazy or not, you can sell a certain thing does not work. There have
been many times. Rossi's agenda is simply to generate interest and support from
those who believe in him or are too polite to tell the truth. Critics ignoring
him completely. Mats Lewan on New Technologies was an
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473cpage=10#comment-39113
Bjorn Genborg
May 15th, 2011 at 6:23 AM
Mr. Rossi,
Regarding controlling capabilities (regulating) of your device; How dynamic can
the power production be adjusted? For example, if a E-cat is in operation,
producing 2,5
Cover: http://www.scientificamerican.com/media/cover/cover_2011-05.jpg
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=radical-energy-solutions
(subscription or paper copy needed)
Cover:
https://subscribe.hearstmags.com/circulation/popularmechanics/images/pop_cvr-reg.jpg
Where did the 130,000 kW come from? Levi reported 130 kW for a brief period.
Levi only reported that he saw the OUTSIDE of the reactor ... presumably a
longer version of the bulge in the nekkid mini eCat.
Essen and Kullander accepted ROSSI's statement that the current reactor is
50cc. All
That's the first report listing the observers for the February 18-hour test:
Giuseppe Levi
Andrea Rossi
Daniele Passerini
David Bianchini === must be Jed's source close to the test !
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton
Sent: Sunday, May 8, 2011 12:29:39 PM
Subject: [Vo]:22
Cold Fusion by Rossi and Focardi
http://dowjonesbusinessnews.com/?p=700
[ I can't figure out if the site is just a blog or any relation to dow jones ]
Cold Fusion Few areas of science are more controversial than cold fusion, the
hypothetical near-room-temperature reaction in which two smaller
Focardi-Rossi Energy-Catalyzer
http://www.angewandtebiologischeneuemedizin.com/en/index.php?title=Focardi-Rossi_Energy-Catalyzer
Part ofEsoWatch.com
Welcome to the wiki of irrational belief systems. We hope you find something
useful or interesting. If you want, you can join us.
Obviously
http://www.theeestory.com/topics/8245?page=7#
frogwing
May I propose something perhaps more worthy of the talent assembled here than
insulting each other?
If this is a scam, I would dearly love to see it exposed unequivocally. If I
were wealthy, I'd be inclined to underwrite a contest with,
randi-like not ran-like
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473
Bjorn Genborg
April 29th, 2011 at 10:02 AM
Dear Mr.Rossi;
Question 1:
What would you consider being the worst “showstopper” for you and your
invention? I mean, what do you consider being the biggest risk/drawback that
could happen? For
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewWorldOrderWhistleBlowers2/message/48636
Cold Fusion:
Filling in for George Noory, host George Knapp welcomed media ecologist James
Martinez for a discussion on cold fusion in the first half of the show. Cold
fusion is a type of purported low energy nuclear
Yes, sorry ... it needs updating. (I have to insert form-feed commands
manually, then run it through a script and then fix it in Acrobat. )
I'll fix it on Monday ... UNLESS, of course, there's a new report to evaluate!
Alan
ps : I just found out in another thread why my reply-to posts have
•
Frank
•
April 15th, 2011 at 8:47 PM
Dear Mr. Rossi,
I wonder if you are aware that Professor Peter Hagelstein of MIT remarked today
that he would love the opportunity to test the E-cat. I found his comments in
this article that was posted on April 15th. I thought you might
I'm still having trouble reconciling the reported numbers for the Feb test
http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm and
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3108242.ece
From: Jed Rothwell (in the calorimetry thread)
In that case, in the Feb. 10 test, when input power was 80 W,
From: Göran Crafte gcra...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 10:55:28 AM
Subject: [Vo]:My very BIG question to Andrea Rossi
I posted the following very BIG question to Andrea Rossi an hour ago. Maybe the
idea is not very new to you. I'm anyway very interested
http://www.qiaolab.com/component/content/article/407
Gianni Degli Antoni ( GDA ) met Prof. Focardi many years ago. He was a young
lecturer at the University of Milano dedicated to helping young people to
acquire skills in computer science. As a physicist, he loved physics. At that
time
A new version is up at
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_frames_v316.php
a) I added the new Swedish interview -comments link
b) I added some new fake methods -- particularly Peter van Noorden's water
bypass and a couple of quibbles from the Randi forum
c) I've reorganized to use frames,
From: Jed Rothwell
He says this may seem like a strange thing to say . . . but the explosion
wasn't a terribly important event.
NYT :
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/world/asia/japan-fukushima-nuclear-reactor.html
The explosion was in the outer container, leaving the main reactor vessel
From: Jed Rothwell
Also there are aftershocks and another 3 meter tsunami is headed for
the shore.
Pseesh! I hope the rescue teams can get out in time!
From: Jed Rothwell
Reactor #3 just exploded.
Confirmed ... but as designed
Before, explosion and after shots.
Also there are aftershocks and another 3 meter tsunami is headed for
the shore.
NO confirmation of that. It was on BBC :
BREAKING NEWS An estimated 3m (10ft) tsunami has been
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2011 2:26:51 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Video of Kullander and Essen interview on YouTube
Physicists Sven Kullander and Hanno Essén interviewed about the
Rossi-Focardi cell, with English subtitles:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt2JqEmaUGc
How do they
From: Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, March 5, 2011 10:03:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Detecting a Fake 10KW Rossi/Focardi eCat Device
Alan's website seems to have mistakes -
I don't doubt it ! I put it up here for review.
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v2.php
From: Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, March 5, 2011 10:03:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Detecting a Fake 10KW Rossi/Focardi eCat Device
Alan's website seems to have mistakes -
You're right
I reversed the conversion factor. and used KWH to MJ instead of MJ to KWH.
What's a
Hi folks .. I've been following you for a while, but this is my first post
March 3rd, 2011 at 6:25 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360cpage=10#comment-26136
Dear Renaissance Man:
Thank you for your kind blessing. I always appreciate it. I need it.
We are now making a RD work
801 - 832 of 832 matches
Mail list logo
