RE: [Vo]:I confess

2013-06-05 Thread Roger B
how you guys like it. Roger Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 20:56:54 -0700 From: a...@well.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:I confess From: Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 6:55:38 PM James, Somehow the article doesn't grab me. How's

RE: [Vo]:I confess

2013-06-05 Thread Roger B
you imagine. I too have wonder if there is some connection between coulombic forces and speed...and frequency. Harry On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com wrote: Disappointing, Joe. 5% is just a little on the slow side, relativity speaking. (:-) I would

RE: [Vo]:I confess

2013-06-05 Thread Roger B
be your default. Also your font is still a bit large. Not that there is anything wrong with that. John On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com wrote: So, my idea is still viable? (:-) Roger Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 01:38:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [Vo]:I confess From: hveeder

RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk?

2013-06-05 Thread Roger B
]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk? Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:54:20 -0500 From Roger B: No, LENR and UFOs are not in the same category. LENR has lots of physical evidence. The so-called physical evidence for UFOs is very weak if not non-existent. I disagree

RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk?

2013-06-05 Thread Roger B
What the font is going on here!! Do you think that I am some kind of pathofont, or scripto-path. I think that it is a conspiracy of fontical correctness. Do font companies hire you guys to try to promote their fonts. You guys are all font deniers. I believe in FREEDOM OF FONTNESS. (:-)

RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk?

2013-06-05 Thread Roger B
to debunk? From: Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 9:54:52 AM What the f o n t is going on here!! Much better ... but I know that you jest. Otherwise you would have included block and shadowed fonts.

RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk?

2013-06-05 Thread Roger B
There must be a reason, Jed, even if we don't know what it is. The only thing that I can think of is that cold fusion is a threat in some sense to people. If a BigFoot flying a saucer should land on the White House lawn and say (in broken English), Howdy, it would cause a lot of excitement,

[Vo]:gmail

2013-06-05 Thread Roger B
I am unable to subscribe using gmail. I send the subscription address and gmail I think keeps telling me that I have to have real address. And anyway, WYSIWYG did not work for me. I got the same font no matter which one I selected. Roger

[Vo]:unsubscribe

2013-06-05 Thread Roger B
“I am Life Eternal. I was Krishna, I was Buddha, I was Jesus and now I am Meher Baba.” Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 22:49:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Johannes Kepler's 4th Law of Planetary Motion From: cheme...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com I like it. I will add that in addition, in order to

[Vo]:Newbie

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
I have been a lurker for a short while, but I figured if skeptopaths are allowed here, I should also be accepted. I think a simple way to deal with skeptopaths is to make a rule that no one may be here who does not accept the reality of LENR. There are plenty of forums where disbelievers in

RE: [Vo]:Newbie

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
@eskimo.com On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com wrote: I have been a lurker for a short while, but I figured if skeptopaths are allowed here, I should also be accepted. I think a simple way to deal with skeptopaths is to make a rule that no one may be here who does

[Vo]:I confess

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
I confess to being an ignoramus. I confess to having only a B.A. in psychology, a B.A. in philosophy, and an A.S. in electronics technology. I am, however, a philosophical savant. I have a question that I have asked several times but have never gotten an answer. By what means do

RE: [Vo]:I confess

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
FAMILIAR PROCESSES REVERSED IN TIME. On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com wrote: I confess to being an ignoramus. I confess to having only a B.A. in psychology, a B.A. in philosophy, and an A.S. in electronics technology. I am, however, a philosophical savant. I

RE: [Vo]:I confess

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
suggest you read ON THE OCCURRENCE OF SOME FAMILIAR PROCESSES REVERSED IN TIME. On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com wrote: I confess to being an ignoramus. I confess to having only a B.A. in psychology, a B.A. in philosophy, and an A.S. in electronics technology. I

RE: [Vo]:I confess

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
at 5:26 PM, Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com wrote: I confess to being an ignoramus. I confess to having only a B.A. in psychology, a B.A. in philosophy, and an A.S. in electronics technology. I am, however, a philosophical savant. I have a question that I have asked several

RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk?

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
Did you just say this: skeptopaths need to tear everyone else down so that they can feel superior. Or: skeptopaths are afraid of anything outside of the box, so they try to get you to come back in. Or: skeptopaths hate anything that might offer hope. Or: one skeptopath I know has severe

RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk?

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
That description gave me quite a start there for a second. I was afraid that you were talking about me. (:-) Roger From: cr...@overunity.co To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk? Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:59:40 -0700 Often

RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk?

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
But, seriously, that was an excellent description. Can you supply a link to it? Roger From: cr...@overunity.co To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk? Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:59:40 -0700 Often pseudosceptics have a high

RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to debunk?

2013-06-04 Thread Roger B
No, LENR and UFOs are not in the same category. LENR has lots of physical evidence. The so-called physical evidence for UFOs is very weak if not non-existent. [LENRs will help people. UFOs are just a distraction from worry about paying one's bills.] The so-called physical evidence for