On Sep 4, 2008, at 6:16 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Surprised that you didn't mention the possibility of a mirror
matter black hole, which might be unreactive with normal matter,
although at that level of extreme density - it is anyone's guess as
to whether everything becomes cosmic mush.
The
On Sep 4, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:55:59
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
If black holes can carry charge, then it may be feasible for them to
form negative "atoms" in which they are the nuclei, and ordinary
atomic nuclei act l
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 4 Sep 2008 05:55:59 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>If black holes can carry charge, then it may be feasible for them to
>form negative "atoms" in which they are the nuclei, and ordinary
>atomic nuclei act like electrons.
[snip]
What is to stop the accelerated
In the "too cute to be real science" department there is a rambling discourse
floating around in cyberspace from an entity known as "qdevice" (John Titor
wannabe?) ... and it provides another way to verbalize what mirror matter
really "is" ... which BTW probably relates to the hypothesis (or gim
Surprised that you didn't mention the possibility of a mirror matter black
hole, which might be unreactive with normal matter, although at that level of
extreme density - it is anyone's guess as to whether everything becomes cosmic
mush.
Hey - since we are walking on the wild-side anyway: Also
Suppose we actually have microscopic black holes in the center of the
moon, or earth for that matter. They would tend to be maintained at
the center of gravity. Their matter consumption rate would depend on
relative motion with that matter, and their cross section for
consumption would be
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 3 Sep 2008 05:53:13 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>OK - but then what about the situation with our moon or Mars -- with almost no
>atmosphere and a dense solid core to absorb cosmic rays ?
This is an excellent point, and I concede. You have put my mind at rest
Robin van Spaandonk wrote: In reply to R C Macaulay's message:
> This is wrong. Cosmic rays are stopped in the atmosphere
> which is a gas, and not
> very dense. That means that microscopic black holes have a
> chance to evaporate
> before traveling their MFP.
> With the supercollider however a
On Sep 2, 2008, at 8:05 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to R C Macaulay's message of Tue, 2 Sep 2008 20:20:19 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
The large Hadron back in the news,
Richard
http://www.worldnetdaily.com:80/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=74044
Quote:
"The Large Hadron Collider will n
In reply to R C Macaulay's message of Tue, 2 Sep 2008 20:20:19 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>The large Hadron back in the news,
>Richard
>
>
>http://www.worldnetdaily.com:80/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=74044
Quote:
"The Large Hadron Collider will not be producing anything that does not happen
routinel
On a philosophical note just because one might have the knowledge, heat,
materials and tools
for producing a thing called a "subatomic particle" that does not establish
the thing is
fundamental to nature.
eg. A blacksmith uses some knowledge, heat, materials and tools
to produce a thing called a
The large Hadron back in the news,
Richard
http://www.worldnetdaily.com:80/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=74044
12 matches
Mail list logo
