On 4/23/07, Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Terry (wishing he had a detachable penis)
Hell no, you'd put it down somewhere and lose it.
On 4/22/07, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
>Enjoy you(r) rapturous stay in the
>NeoCon wing of the Matrix
>
>Kokopelli rules ;-)
>
What does that mean?
The trickster rules:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kokopelli
Terry (wishing he had a detachable penis)
John Berry wrote:-
<>
Actually, I think blame is vitally important in this situation. Scientists and
environmentalists have been warning about various aspects of human induced
climate change at least since the mid seventies. I was talking about it on the
radio in 1992 (15 years ago...). During
Jones Beene wrote:
One warped comment to add into the bogosity mix:
People are not destroying the planet.. maybe themselves
individually and in collective groups.. but not the
planet..
I agree with this part of Richard's summation, but he
may be viewing the situation in the context of a
n
ROTECTED]>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 12:08:54 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.
Indeed Paul, whether you and Dr Brenda and the IPCC http://www.ipcc.ch/are
right is irrelevant. The real question is, can humanity remediate
Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.
Indeed Paul, whether you and Dr Brenda and the IPCC http://www.ipcc.ch/ are
right is irrelevant. The real question is, can humanity remediate global
warming, and how, we should be practical about this.
Thomas suggested some drives as prop
attraction, centrifugal force and photon pressure, comments/criticisms
welcome on this.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Lowrance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually b
One warped comment to add into the bogosity mix:
> People are not destroying the planet.. maybe
themselves
> individually and in collective groups.. but not the
planet..
I agree with this part of Richard's summation, but he
may be viewing the situation in the context of a
narrow religious proph
Kyle R. Mcallister wrote:
[snip
Should we try to cut emissions of "bad" gases? Sure, why not, but not at
the detriment of the basis of our society, that is, the working class.
Maybe anyone in an environmentalist organization should be given a
severe tax increase to support a changeover to somet
thomas malloy wrote:
> Paul Lowrance wrote:
>
>> thomas malloy wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Lowrance wrote:
>>>
>>> There are scientists who disagree with Dr. Brenda,
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU
>>>
>> No doubt, but Dr. Brenda said nearly all climate scientists now agree
>> with the
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Lowrance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 2:05 AM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.
There are scientists who disagree with Dr. Brenda,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xtt
Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
There are scientists who disagree with Dr. Brenda,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU
No doubt, but Dr. Brenda said nearly all climate scientists now agree
with the recent overwhelming data that clearly indicates hum
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
> Howdy Vorts,
>
> As the world turns, the rant goes on and the stomach turns. People are
> not destroying the planet.. maybe themselves individually and in
> collective groups.. but not the planet.. that's coming, but by design
> and not by human decree or PHD.
> Richard
>>> >
Howdy Vorts,
As the world turns, the rant goes on and the stomach turns. People are not
destroying the planet.. maybe themselves individually and in collective
groups.. but not the planet.. that's coming, but by design and not by human
decree or PHD.
Richard
> One sided propaganda, she was t
thomas malloy wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
> One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused
Well, it is difficult to ignore Dr. Brenda, PhD's credentials, and the
fact that she is and has worked in the field of climate science.
Furthermore Dr. Bre
Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
> One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused
Well, it is difficult to ignore Dr. Brenda, PhD's credentials, and the
fact that she is and has worked in the field of climate science.
Furthermore Dr. Brenda said the mass majo
Michel Jullian wrote:
It seems to me that whatever the causes of GW, if we want a remedy we will have
to take care of it.
Jed mentioned orbiting parasols once, I then understood he was talking about Earth orbits so I
You could use either the Cook Drive or the E M Drive to hold the parasol
i
thomas malloy wrote:
> One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused
> warming to talk about anything else. She ignored the issue of the Sun's
> increased irradiance.
Actually I recall Dr. Brenda did indeed address this.
> Also the observation that temperature incre
of the Sun-Earth line a unit parasol area
would be most efficient?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "thomas malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.
> Paul Lowran
Paul Lowrance wrote:
I'm surprised nobody at Vo picked up on climate scientist Brenda
Ekwurzel, PhD. guest on Coast To Coast AM show last Saturday --
One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused
warming to talk about anything else. She ignored the issue of the Sun
I'm surprised nobody at Vo picked up on climate scientist Brenda Ekwurzel, PhD.
guest on Coast To Coast AM show last Saturday -->
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2007/04/14.html
Leading climate science researcher Brenda Ekwurzel, PhD. announced the just
recent overwhelming evidence from c
21 matches
Mail list logo
