Not too bad, Motl is a pain in mine and everyone else's nucleus, that's about
it. My work is already published, so I don't much care if it's on the arXiv,
you can get it from Academia.edu.
--
"I write a little. I erase a lot." - Chopin
At 09:28 AM 11/1/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 06:38 PM 10/31/2011, Danny Ross Lunsford wrote:
Hi all, I'm new.
btw : I see you have lots of hits in google .. and that you've had
run-ins with arXiv (sympathetic to rossi, then!), motl, not-even-wrong etc etc.
t has been gathered
during these tests is difficult to interpret.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Alan J Fletcher
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Nov 1, 2011 12:28 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Large ECAT System Test Convincing But Not Pretty
At 06:38 PM 10/31/2011, Danny Ross Lunsford wrote:
Hi all, I'
At 06:57 PM 10/31/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Just assign a new thread title in the "Subject" line and you will
create a new top level item.
It's a bit trickier than that ... you have to start a brand new message.
A "reply to" goes into the middle of the existing thread, not a new one.
At 06:38 PM 10/31/2011, Danny Ross Lunsford wrote:
Hi all, I'm new.
What I find astounding is the knee-jerk reactions of the intelligent
lay person, who may even be an engineer or a scientist in a "softer"
discipline (no disrespect intended). I participate in an amateur
astronomy forum where,
Danny Ross Lunsford wrote:
No, I meant that to be a top-level post. I'm not very adept yet at this
> format for discussions.
Just assign a new thread title in the "Subject" line and you will create a
new top level item.
This software sometimes goes bonkers like the sorcerer's apprentice and
s
, Oct 31, 2011 9:52 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Large ECAT System Test Convincing But Not Pretty
No, I meant that to be a top-level post. I'm not very adept yet at this format
for discussions.
-drl
--
"I write a little. I erase a lot." - Chopin
No, I meant that to be a top-level post. I'm not very adept yet at this format
for discussions.
-drl
--
"I write a little. I erase a lot." - Chopin
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Danny Ross Lunsford wrote:
> I would like to think that someone today who is in the same place as I was
> 30 years ago could make a better go of it.
>
>
Welcome, Danny. Let's hope so!
T
-l
Sent: Mon, Oct 31, 2011 9:38 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Large ECAT System Test Convincing But Not Pretty
Hi all, I'm new.
What I find astounding is the knee-jerk reactions of the intelligent lay
person, who may even be an engineer or a scientist in a "softer" discipline (no
disr
f
it. I would like to think that someone today who is in the same place as I was
30 years ago could make a better go of it.
-drl
--
"I write a little. I erase a lot." - Chopin
--- On Mon, 10/31/11, David Roberson wrote:
From: David R
The latest system test where 107 individual ECAT modules were connected
together was successful but could have been much more convincing. System
instabilities forced the power output to be reduced to 470 kW and for it to be
run in an open loop mode instead of the 1 MW that we were all expectin
12 matches
Mail list logo
