In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:41:45 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin
>
>> More than evidence on paper, Mills has bottles of the stuff (literally).
>> See http://www.blacklightpower.com/images/Chemicals.jpg
>
>... old news, and largely meaningless for this discussion.
Yes, it is
Robin
More than evidence on paper, Mills has bottles of the stuff (literally).
See http://www.blacklightpower.com/images/Chemicals.jpg
... old news, and largely meaningless for this discussion.
What is in those vials, no one but Mills has a clue; and he is likely
just guessing or he would pu
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:37:50 -0700 (PDT):
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>Robin
>
>>Prediction: "intrinsic angular momentum" is itself related to charge
>>somehow, and also to the LST quasi-particle, and all will be resolved
>>once these three issues are integrated [the thr
On 3/18/07, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For the moment, at least, this lack of evidence for a charged variety allows me
to affirm with some smugness, that he got it wrong.
"smugness
noun
an excessive feeling of self-satisfaction"
Winter is almost over. It's time to get out more.
Robin
>Prediction: "intrinsic angular momentum" is itself related to charge
>somehow, and also to the LST quasi-particle, and all will be resolved
>once these three issues are integrated [the three are "intrinsic angular
>momentum", charge, and the quasi-particle and the resolution will
>exp
5 matches
Mail list logo
