Hi Stephen,
>Yeah, I'll probably fiddle around some more with this, just because it
>seems like the "pre-ring" is going the wrong way and I'd like to
>understand why.
That's good. While the scope precludes you from doing any interesting
shock wave experiments ( way too slow ) you can certainly
Keith Nagel wrote:
Hi Stephen,
it looks like it has something to
do with the signal itself, almost like the "pre-ringing" of a perfect
low-pass filter
Given that your cutoff frequency is 60MHz, the leading edge
of the signals you are seeing probably bear little relationship
to the actual s
Hi Stephen,
>it looks like it has something to
>do with the signal itself, almost like the "pre-ringing" of a perfect
>low-pass filter
Given that your cutoff frequency is 60MHz, the leading edge
of the signals you are seeing probably bear little relationship
to the actual state of the signal. I
so the probe's ground clip would "float".
K.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:40 PM
To: Vortex
Subject: [Vo]: Speed of light confirmed
OK, I admit it, this is pretty boring. But you folks
about
that negative going structure that is appearing
between 0 and 15ns on the received channel.
Any thoughts about that?
K.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:40 PM
To: Vortex
Subject: [Vo]: Speed of light con
OK, I admit it, this is pretty boring. But you folks are the only
people I can think of who might possibly respond to this with something
other than a glazed look and the question, "You did what? Uh ... why?"
The answer, of course, is "just cause I wanted to see for myself".
Basement measure
6 matches
Mail list logo
