In reply to John Steck's message of Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:30:11
-0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>I know picking a side is contentious, but I disagree entirely with that
>statement. I will not argue the point that we are too reliant on a single
>fuel source, that this addiction is dumping excessive C02 into the
>
d study the event, we
are just canaries in the coal mine.
...ok, I am bumming myself out now. sorry.
-john
-Original Message-
From: Robin van Spaandonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 1:09 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: The Military and Hubbert
Since
In reply to John Steck's message of Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:42:15
-0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Nor does it take into effect phenomenon like old/tapped wells filling back
>up by unknown means
While this is apparently happening to some extent in some cases,
it clearly can't keep up with demand, or the US wouldn
true, but likely not going to happen like that.
-john
-Original Message-
From: Robin van Spaandonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 10:18 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: The Military and Hubbert
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 2
One side makes you tall, one side makes you small says the Major. 8^)
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 6:44 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: The Military and Hubbert
On 7/26/06, Robin van Spaandonk <[EM
Terry Blanton wrote:
> On 7/26/06, Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> For a very interesting read see also
>> http://www.greatchange.org/ov-simmons,club_of_rome_revisted.html
>
> I read this book when I was in college! Thanks for reminding me of it.
>
> I came up with an excel
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:43:35
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I came up with an excellent solution: all we need to do is shrink
>humans and all our technology to a much smaller size and the resources
>would last much longer. ;-)
>
>And, yes, I was smokin' wacky tobaccy back
On 7/26/06, Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For a very interesting read see also
http://www.greatchange.org/ov-simmons,club_of_rome_revisted.html
I read this book when I was in college! Thanks for reminding me of it.
I came up with an excellent solution: all we need to do is
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:32:07
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>If we maintain a mean consumption of 10^8 barrels per day (it's around
>88 mbpd now), 10^12 will last 10^4 days, or totally deplete in 2033.
>We will be bankrupt and dead long before that. Idiots.
[snip]
If you st
http://www.energybulletin.net/18056.html
excerpt from a long article:
"The American Petroleum Institute estimates that 1.1 trillion barrels
of oil remain; accordingly, this supply would last only 43 years.
Estimates of peak world production vary. The U.S. Geological Survey
predicts the world's p
10 matches
Mail list logo
