The point is that as you shrink it energy density will increase and I
simply assume there is a limit for how much density space can take. I alsa
suggest that this limit is consistent with lorentz transformations as it
would not make sense if this depends on which frame the observer has. This
also m
In reply to Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of Mon, 1 May 2023 17:52:27
+0200:
Hi Stefan,
Though I find it difficult to visualize, I think that if you allow the major
radius of a toroid to shrink to zero, you
end up with a sphere.
Cloud storage:-
Unsafe, Slow, Expensive
...pick any three.
In reply to Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of Mon, 1 May 2023 17:52:27
+0200:
Hi Stefan,
Re. gravity, see
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/2032981/downloads/2032981.pdf
Cloud storage:-
Unsafe, Slow, Expensive
...pick any three.
In reply to Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of Mon, 1 May 2023 17:52:27
+0200:
Hi Stefan,
You write:-
"Now the total amount of energy is 2u if we assume equal amount of electrical
energy as magnetic energy, hence if we integrate.
F = Utot/va
But according to special relativity we have,
Utot =
Hi
First of all, the pre-history of the linked article exists at
different dark corners of the internet and most likely I'm not the original
person behind these ideas. But I find the thought experiment logical and
feel that I'm obligated to popularize the ideas as they seem coherent in
many ways.
5 matches
Mail list logo
