[Vo]:Best of the best near-term horizon

2008-04-17 Thread Jones Beene
Query: when does something once considered cheap, mundane, black and fairly toxic become all-important to society, if not the ultimate answer to our national survival? BTW - this has nothing at all to do with last night's debate ... If there is one defining feature of this particular

Re: [Vo]:Best of the best near-term horizon

2008-04-17 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Terry, too bad the guy over at GT (Walter de Heere) who is a pioneer in graphene transistors, did not discover this technique himself... or maybe he has something else which is as effective, who knows. One can not

Re: [Vo]:Best of the best near-term horizon

2008-04-17 Thread Nick Palmer
Jones wrote about graphene as an alternative to the transparent indium tin oxide solar cell. It looks promising but on page two of the article there was this dampener... They also need to improve the conductivity of their film: indium tin oxide is still hundreds of times more conductive.

Re: [Vo]:Best of the best near-term horizon

2008-04-17 Thread Jones Beene
Nick, Yes, this low efficiency is undoubtedly true for now. But here is the (possible) paradigm shift, and I should have tried to explain my enthusiasm as involving a paradigm shift rather than as a step-wise improvement. Even if the efficiency remains far less than for a dedicated solar

Re: [Vo]:Best of the best near-term horizon

2008-04-17 Thread Nick Palmer
Jones Beene wrote:- Even if the efficiency remains far less than for a dedicated solar panel, with this kind of shift in economics, that lower efficiency is not the real issue I wasn't being negative. In fact, for a long time I have thought that, apart from the research value, it is

Re: [Vo]:Best of the best near-term horizon

2008-04-17 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:23:43 -0700 (PDT): Hi, [snip] Nick, Yes, this low efficiency is undoubtedly true for now. But here is the (possible) paradigm shift, and I should have tried to explain my enthusiasm as involving a paradigm shift rather than as a