Howdy Mike,
And thus we gain another glimpse of the new century strategies being used to
"capture" revenue streams derived from intellectual property... or should I
say "properties". Actually the field remains open to a new legimate form of
pirating ownership before discovery. hmmm
Google con
- Original Message -
From: "OrionWorks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO
Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP
would attempt to patent
Can theories be copyrighted?
Harry
On 12/5/2008 4:37 PM, OrionWorks wrote:
> Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP
> would attempt to patent a theoretical process involving the
> calculation of electron states via software simulations.
>
> Is this latest battle rel
Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP
would attempt to patent a theoretical process involving the
calculation of electron states via software simulations.
Is this latest battle related to Randy's Millsian Molecular Modeling
endeavors, or is this a follow-up to recent
- Original Message -
From: "OrionWorks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "vortex-l"
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:40 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO
What I'd like to know is whether UK IPO's final decision was due to a
After reading the decision of the patent examiner, my impression is that
the patent was rejected for good reason. The rejection argument is not
that the theory is wrong but that Mills is trying to patent a theory and
its application to calculating electron states. This would be like
having a pa
For those who have a propensity towards understanding lawyer-speak.
Jones? Mr. Carrell?
http://lawbites.com/blacklight-power-sci-fi-science-rejected-by-uk-ipo/
http://tinyurl.com/5wwbvp
and
http://www.ipo.gov.uk/patent/p-decisionmaking/p-challenge/p-challenge-decision-results/p-challenge-decisi
7 matches
Mail list logo
