There could be a reason why Horace's deflated fusion model doesn't work with
only hydrogen- IOW a version of the proton fusion reaction - leading to
deuterium; BUT if it can fit, then it provides many clear advantages to a
Rossi-type of device, and cannot be ruled-out simply because the inventor
In addition to the fusion of deflated hydrogen, there is an alternative in
the possible fusion of IRH (inverted Rydberg hydrogen).
The difference between the two, as I understand it is that IRH is trapped in
2D (two dimensions) on a dielectric surface via 'mirror charge' while
according to
On Apr 15, 2011, at 7:38 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
There could be a reason why Horace's deflated fusion model doesn't
work with
only hydrogen-
The model works fine. The model explains heavy element fusion as
well. It is p-p or p-e-p that does not occur with observable, but
not because
Horace,
Proton pairs don't bind by the strong force, so this eliminates the
prospect for the follow-on weak reaction, at least at readily
observable levels.
Well - They can bind for an indeterminate period, according to Nyman.
http://dipole.se/
Go down to Strong Force between Two
From Jones:
...
3) However, it is occasionally possible to shoot protons at each other with
the right speed and quark positions so that they latch on to each other -
held in place by the Strong Force.
Without one of the protons converting into a neutron? I thought that
was impossible.
Steven - the simulation does not go there.
It is too complicated for me to say if the simulation is accurate or not. I
like it, and have not found anything obviously wrong with it yet. Everyone
interprets the shadows on Plato's cave in their own way
If one doesn't mind admitting that he
From Jones:
...
By that, I also mean since H works well on its own - no way do you waste time
with D, since it can never make commercial sense, even if it improves the
reaction rate by a large amount. Ergo, when someone mentions D at all in the
context of a Ni-H demonstration - then it is
7 matches
Mail list logo
