Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

2015-11-09 Thread Eric Walker
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: The usual ranting of Ethan Siegel against anomalies that don't respect > theory. > Ethan Siegel's argument in this instance is essentially an argument from authority -- the authorities are right, so the cold fusion people must be wrong. His ge

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

2015-11-09 Thread Ron Kita
Siegelwell.doubt that he even cares about this Oct Paper: https://www.academia.edu/17964553/Condensed_Matter_Nuclear_Science_October_2015 Per Aspera...Ad Astra, Ron..I would rather have my mind opened by the joy of discovery..than closed by my beliefs Siegel mission was a conclusion e

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

2015-11-09 Thread Ron Kita
Ahhhthe famous Edison light bulb scam: Light cannot be created without something being burned! Grins, Ron Kita, Chiralex On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Hmm permalink didn't work, but here it is: > > Alain Coetmeur 4 hours ago > > EmDrive phenomenon is still uncer

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

2015-11-09 Thread Blaze Spinnaker
Hmm permalink didn't work, but here it is: Alain Coetmeur 4 hours ago EmDrive phenomenon is still uncertain, and may well be an unimagined artifact. Unimagined because until now, no artifact was able toe explain the result, and EmDrive phenomenon was replicated. Ethan Siegel, as usual give prior

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

2015-11-09 Thread Blaze Spinnaker
Brilliant smackdown: http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2015/11/08/the-em-drive-nasas-impossible-engine-highlights-our-greatest-failing/?commentId=comment_blogAndPostId/blog/comment/4033-120-22 On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > What's particularly arrogant is he s

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

2015-11-09 Thread Blaze Spinnaker
What's particularly arrogant is he says "respect scientists" but then he's denigrating all of the extremely well educated and talented scientists that actually believe in cold fusion. I think Ethan is having a nervous breakdown. On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > It's just

Re: [Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

2015-11-09 Thread Blaze Spinnaker
It's just click bait. Move on. On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > The usual ranting of Ethan Siegel against anomalies that don't respect > theory. > > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2015/11/08/the-em-drive-nasas-impossible-engine-highlights-our-greatest-faili

[Vo]:Ethan Siegel in Forbes: bashing E-cat, LENr and EmDrive ins a love declaration to theory

2015-11-09 Thread Alain Sepeda
The usual ranting of Ethan Siegel against anomalies that don't respect theory. http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2015/11/08/the-em-drive-nasas-impossible-engine-highlights-our-greatest-failing/ one day we will have to tell him what is science.