In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:29:31 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>At 01:20 AM 4/7/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
>>I think that if you put two devices in series you already get
>>superheated steam,
>>so more than that is likely overkill.
>
>Doesn't the temperature of the
materials.
Dennis
--
From: "Jed Rothwell"
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 12:06 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How small Rossi devices might be ganged together
For what it's worth here is sketch of the configuration I have in mind.
T
For what it's worth here is sketch of the configuration I have in mind.
There are multiple cooling pipes in parallel.
When the nickel catalyst heats up, it heats the entire engine block. If
some of the catalyst cylinders do not heat effectively the heat is still
evenly distributed across the e
@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How small Rossi devices might be ganged together
wrote:
>> Yup. But I started writing that text before I learned that. Besides a 10 x
>> 10 array is easy to envision, whereas . . . 17 x 17?
I think that if you put two devices in series you already get
wrote:
> >> Yup. But I started writing that text before I learned that. Besides a 10
> x
> >> 10 array is easy to envision, whereas . . . 17 x 17?
>
> I think that if you put two devices in series you already get superheated
> steam,
> so more than that is likely overkill. In short I would expec
2011 7:03 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How small Rossi devices might be ganged together
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
wrote:.
Doesn't the temperature of the heated water depend on the flow rate? If
there are devices in series, the problem I see is that the devices would
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
wrote:.
> Doesn't the temperature of the heated water depend on the flow rate? If
> there are devices in series, the problem I see is that the devices would
> operate at different temperatures.
>
> You could, however, adjust the flow rate to adj
At 01:20 AM 4/7/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I think that if you put two devices in series you already get
superheated steam,
so more than that is likely overkill.
Doesn't the temperature of the heated water depend on the flow rate?
If there are devices in series, the problem I see is that
epus?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:48 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
wrote:
> For the sake of linguistic brevity I would like offer up the suggestion that
> Rossi's smaller "e-Cat" configuration... what has been called "e-Kittens" (a
> wonderfully descriptive linguistic representation, by th
For the sake of linguistic brevity I would like offer up the suggestion that
Rossi's smaller "e-Cat" configuration... what has been called "e-Kittens" (a
wonderfully descriptive linguistic representation, by the way!) be
abbreviated to one of the following terms:
e-kit (Short for e-kittin
All the generators have to be balanced- heating capacity = cooling capacity;
you cannot cool the second E-cat in a row with steam- very bad heat
transmission. It must be something like warm- hot- very- hot- steam, or with
the cooling "line" under pressure. Not an easy problem, however not an
imposs
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Thu, 7 Apr 2011 07:51:42 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
>> Yup. But I started writing that text before I learned that. Besides a 10 x
>> 10 array is easy to envision, whereas . . . 17 x 17?
I think that if you put two devices in series you already get superheated steam,
so
Have you seen what has answered Rossi re my question about E-lions or
E-tigers? Here IS a problem, but 300 E-kitten bound together IS a greater
problem, I think
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
>
>
>> According to Rossi's latest plans, the megawatt r
SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
> According to Rossi's latest plans, the megawatt reactor is going to be made
> of not 100, but 300 smaller units similar in size to those seen in photos .
> . .
Yup. But I started writing that text before I learned that. Besides a 10 x
10 array is easy to envision, wher
On 2011-04-06 22:06, Jed Rothwell wrote:
A few weeks ago I mentioned that I think ganging together many small
Rossi devices will call for some complicated engineering. Perhaps it
will slow down the development of the 1 MW reactor. I'm sure that 100
units can be coordinated but it may take a team
I meant to say the screw holes would be used to admit hydrogen into the
cells, or evacuate them. Maybe they would be used to admit nitrogen to shut
the thing down.
100 individual hydrogen pressure hoses running to 100 cylinders would be an
engineering headache but I suppose something can be worked
A few weeks ago I mentioned that I think ganging together many small Rossi
devices will call for some complicated engineering. Perhaps it will slow
down the development of the 1 MW reactor. I'm sure that 100 units can be
coordinated but it may take a team of engineers some time to design such a
sys
17 matches
Mail list logo
