While Obama promises to redistribute the wealth, isn't it great that we have
a fine organization like Acorn to redistribute the votes.
Jeff
Jeff Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While Obama promises to redistribute the wealth, isn't it great that we have
a fine organization like Acorn to redistribute the votes.
Let us keep this discussion factual. What ACORN did cannot affect a single
vote, or result in any false registrations.
It couldn't be easier! See:
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/how-to-steal-an-election-with-a-diebold-machine-200693.php
- Jed
Edmund Storms wrote:
Jed, do you still think these flaws were accidental, a result of
incompetence, or just sloppy design? Do you think the Republicans are
not out to steal the election if they could?
Indeed.
There was a lot of noise on the Internet after the 2004 election about
the
Edmund Storms wrote:
Jed, do you still think these flaws were accidental, a result of
incompetence, or just sloppy design?
Well, naturally I have my suspicions. Who wouldn't? But I still think
that I cannot know the answer to this question without evidence. I
mean evidence that would stand
Whoa -
Do you think the Republicans are not out to steal the election if they could?
Why them and not the Dems?
I do not think either party has a monopoly on dishonesty or dirty tricks.
Now that the machine has been reversed engineered, etc. and done so at
Universities - (where there is a
Jones Beene wrote:
Do you think the Republicans are not out to steal the election if
they could?
Why them and not the Dems?
Well, in recent history going back to Nixon and the plumbers,
Republicans have been more inclined to cheat than Democrats. Or at
least, they have gotten caught more
On Oct 17, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Whoa -
Do you think the Republicans are not out to steal the election if
they could?
Why them and not the Dems?
In this case, the owner of Diebold was a strong supporter of the
Republicans. This requires the Democrats to use other
8 matches
Mail list logo
