Terry,
… good to see someone is fact-checking. The damage could be inflated several
orders of magnitude with other assumptions, but clearly a gram of this isotope
is not as scary as first imagined … about the same energy as plutonium it
seems… yet still a milligram of it is not something yo
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> There are major implications of that possibility, and that is the scare.
>
> A gram of 62Ni is about .016 moles and could contains about 10^19 quantum
> dots of the isotope. A closer estimate, which account for impurities and
> imperfections
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Teslaalset
wrote:
Say... maybe I should rush this idea off to USPTO : Too late, you made
> this prior art by posting it on this public reflector.
>
We still don't know *how* to make the super Higgs boson of 62Ni, which is
something that Jones could disclose
Say... maybe I should rush this idea off to USPTO : Too late, you made
this prior art by posting it on this public reflector.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: mix...@bigpond.com
>
> > Could that happen? Hope not, since its more than a
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
> Could that happen? Hope not, since its more than all the nukes in
everyone's arsenal. Could a gram of anything spell the end of everything.
that is the big scare.
>> Probably not, since, as you have previously pointed out, enriched Ni62 is
a
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:03:17 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Could that happen? Hope not, since its more than all the nukes in everyones
>arsenal. Could a gram of anything spell the end of everything
that is the big
>scare.
Probably not, since, as you have previously poin
Condensed mater can mimic all sorts of exotic particles. Science has just
found the weyl particle in certain material with strong spin orbit coupling.
http://phys.org/news/2015-12-weyl-fermion-discovery-ten-breakthrough.html
The Weyl fermion was predicted by Dirac but never found in isolation.
h
Jones,
Has there ever been any evidence that super-symmetry exists? I consider it
in the realm of string theory; just another theorists dream.
Ron
--On Thursday, June 16, 2016 11:03 AM -0700 Jones Beene
wrote:
Here is your terrifying scare-of-the day. It was inspired by Nick
Bostrom's ne
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 2:03 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Is Particle Physics About to Crack?
Here is your terrifying scare-of-the day. It was inspired by Nick Bostrom’s new
book which does not go anywhere near this far.
a
Here is your terrifying scare-of-the day. It was inspired by Nick Bostrom’s new
book which does not go anywhere near this far.
In the context of LENR, it has been mentioned here that nickel-62 is a
one-of-a-kind singularity in the periodic table. It is the most stable isotope
in all of natur
Imagine the basic 13 atom FCC quantum dot made of the isotope nickel 62. It
would have mass-energy of 751 GeV. This crystal is composed of atomic and
nuclear bosons (pure 62Ni).
Let’s assume that this particle has two potential identities – one being the
particle described above and the other b
Here is something worth thinking about in the context of why nickel could be
effective for creating a thermal anomaly (as seen in LENR) in the context of
supersymmetry and the 750 GeV “big-god” particle. (let’s call it the “BG” so as
not to offend). Admittedly, this takes SUSY to the extreme.
T
I should have explained that SUSY is short for supersymmetry.
Supersymmetry is a proposed type of spacetime symmetry that relates the basic
classes of elementary particles: bosons and fermions… thus the speculation that
there could be a fermion “relative” to the new boson which has special
p
"If the new kid’s name is SUSY, does that mean the her partner will be a
750 GEV fermion?"
I saw in an explanation that the particle must be a boson with spin 1
because it produces 2 photons with spin 1.
This means that the 750 particle is a force carrier, This particle could be
the particle that
Then there is SUSY.
If the new particle-x (and/or 5th force) and the LHC 750 GeV boson are
validated in some way, along with the Higgs, is the agglomeration of all of
these new findings the real 5th force, and not any constituent particle?
(and is it coincidental that the mass of 6 Higgs par
Is Particle Physics About to Crack?
This story appeared today on the Sci-Am blog.
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/is-particle-physics-about-to-
crack-wide-open/
. but it can be (should be) read in the context of two other recent stories
in particle physics, all from last week - and
16 matches
Mail list logo
