Re: [Vo]:Is the itty-bitty photo visible?

2011-07-19 Thread Bastiaan Bergman
I did the same, using a water cooker, and got about 90% efficiency assuming textbook heat to vaporize water. I am a little worried though, about: 1) The, to my feeling, rather slow rate of vapor/steam escaping Rossi's hose as seen in Krivits video My water cooker is 1.5kW, Rossi's water cooker is

[Vo]:Is the itty-bitty photo visible?

2011-07-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
I posted a message titled Calibrating a pair of K-type thermocouples with an itty-bitty 17 kilobyte photo attached. Did the message come through? Did the picture come through? If you cannot see the picture and you really want to see it, contact me directly and I will send it. It is no big deal. I

RE: [Vo]:Is the itty-bitty photo visible?

2011-07-18 Thread Mark Iverson
jed, I got the post and the picture... -Mark _ From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 12:22 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Is the itty-bitty photo visible? I posted a message titled Calibrating a pair of K-type thermocouples

Re: [Vo]:Is the itty-bitty photo visible?

2011-07-18 Thread Peter Gluck
It is perfectly visible. But let's measure the enthalpy of the steam not any other characteristic Peter On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote: I posted a message titled Calibrating a pair of K-type thermocouples with an itty-bitty 17 kilobyte photo attached.

Re: [Vo]:Is the itty-bitty photo visible?

2011-07-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
Peter Gluck wrote: It is perfectly visible. But let's measure the enthalpy of the steam not any other characteristic I am calibrating thermocouples. Is that not allowed? More calibrations and more specific information about temperatures, duration, the mass of metal and the mass of cooling